<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>SCCA's &quot;Stepped&quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
        <description>So this last year was the pilot program for SCCA getting back into Rallysprint.


2015's pilot events were initially both called RallySprint, but then later split into  2 different names.

Now it's-&quot;RallyTrials&quot; and &quot;RallySprint&quot;.

RallyTrials is just a slightly faster and slighty longer course than that normally allowed in SCCA Rallyx.
So run on a closed course like rallyx

Rallysprint, like other sanctioning bodies RallySprints,will be more like a stage rally,but no notes or transits...basically a single rally stage ran back and forth on closed roads.


So their stepped plan for the American Rallyist is:

SCCA Rallyx&gt;SCCA RallyTrials&gt;SCCA RallySprint&gt;(Non SCCA) Stage Rally.




Here is some drone footage of the RallyTrial held at Prairie City this year:

[video]https://youtu.be/H7hi6qFe5-U[/video]


Here is some onboard from the RallySprint at Team O'Neil's this year:

[video]https://youtu.be/XhPbVGfTJSk[/video]



This year's pilot program required a rally or road raced caged log booked car for either the RallyTrials or RallySprint, but signs point to possible a 4 point roll bar being allowed for RallyTrials for 2016.

Unfortunately the reg's are not finalized yet.

But lower entry fees, less traveling,not having to have have a race License or drivers suit,full rally cage, Etc. may be beneficial to those who cannot commit to stage rally at this time.

What do you guys think?</description>
        <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109270#msg-109270</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 04:23:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.15a</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,111912#msg-111912</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,111912#msg-111912</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi Dustin....<br />
<br />
Looks  like you guys have a nice program back there-good luck to you...<br />
<br />
In other news..the June 5th SoCal debut SCCA RallyTrial I posted about earlier in the thread is still on... but now has apparently absolutely nothing to do with SCCA...hmm...<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
It's now called a &quot;rallyx special&quot; and still requires a roll bar and full cotton clothing<br />
<br />
<a href="http://myautoevents.com/pls/mae/frmEventDetail.Show?psevent_id=15682" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://myautoevents.com/pls/mae/frmEventDetail.Show?psevent_id=15682</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.dirally.com/forums/showthread.php?34208-Porterfield-RallyX-2-RallyX-Special-Glen-Helen-Jun-4-5" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://www.dirally.com/forums/showthread.php?34208-Porterfield-RallyX-2-RallyX-Special-Glen-Helen-Jun-4-5</a><br />
<br />
<br />
Works for me...except my junk still ain't running....hopefully there is a  next time...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>RALLYRS</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 19:16:03 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,111911#msg-111911</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,111911#msg-111911</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>DirtySpeed</strong><br/>
Not sure this should be my 1st post. Here we go.<br />
<br />
I'm the founder of StatelineRallycross.com entering our 3rd season in Northern IL and 1st season in Arkansas with both timed events and head to head rallycross events.<br />
<br />
We along with Indiana Rallycross have been doing &quot;rallytrials&quot; for a few years. I knew there was more to Rallycross than what most SCCA events offered. We started SLRC to help Drivers enjoy longer courses without cones.<br />
<br />
I hope you will take time to see out page, FB page and come out to enjoy our events.<br />
<br />
Where would be the best place here to post info about our group and events?<br />
<br />
I wish SCCA and the other Rallycross programs the best, Dustin</div></blockquote>
<br />
Hi Dustin, rally here is a good place...<br />
For those who don't do the Faceplace book thing why dontcha post rules and classes and piccies!<br />
More piccies!<br />
Sound like fun to get to boot it a bit.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>john vanlandingham</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 18:13:05 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,111909#msg-111909</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,111909#msg-111909</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Not sure this should be my 1st post. Here we go.<br />
<br />
I'm the founder of StatelineRallycross.com entering our 3rd season in Northern IL and 1st season in Arkansas with both timed events and head to head rallycross events.<br />
<br />
We along with Indiana Rallycross have been doing &quot;rallytrials&quot; for a few years. I knew there was more to Rallycross than what most SCCA events offered. We started SLRC to help Drivers enjoy longer courses without cones.<br />
<br />
I hope you will take time to see out page, FB page and come out to enjoy our events.<br />
<br />
Where would be the best place here to post info about our group and events?<br />
<br />
I wish SCCA and the other Rallycross programs the best, Dustin]]></description>
            <dc:creator>DirtySpeed</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 16:19:20 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109990#msg-109990</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109990#msg-109990</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I assume the elevation changes thing is to prevent putting a jump on the course with cars that really aren't prepped for it.  I seem to remember that being a big deal at a certain rallycross venue, jumps were very much a no-no for some insurance/legal reason..<br />
<br />
I recall seeing over 80 mph in the old turbo beetle on 2 different rallycross courses, and one autocross.  One of those rallycrosses had a &quot;hill&quot; that was <i>almost</i> a jump at that speed.  At another one on snow, that 80+ straight ended with a L1 onto tarmac with the timing trailer nearby...  I was sure someone was going through it eventually, but the snow got to the point that the speeds dropped later in the day.<br />
<br />
It'd be hard to design a course that stayed under 70 mph.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:23:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109920#msg-109920</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109920#msg-109920</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ so far it looks pretty good to me.<br />
lower cost to build a car and lower entry fees]]></description>
            <dc:creator>tdrrally</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 15:39:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109911#msg-109911</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109911#msg-109911</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ The question I have is can the roll bar brace be a bracket bolting to the stock upper seat belt mount or does it have to be attached back to the rear tower area?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>NoCoast</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:15:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109910#msg-109910</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109910#msg-109910</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>RALLYRS</strong><br/>
 RallyTrials Courses<br />
1 RallyTrials courses shall be placed on relatively level, smooth dirt or gravel surfaces and shall<br />
avoid incorporating significant elevation changes or abrupt high-speed turns. Course design<br />
should normally provide a combination of flowing turns connected by short straight<br />
sections.<br />
2 Maximum speeds on straights should not normally exceed 60 miles per hour for the fastest<br />
vehicles.</div></blockquote>
<br />
&quot;Relatively level&quot;, &quot;shall avoid&quot;, and &quot;should not normally&quot; are not complete restrictions. :)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>NoCoast</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 19:14:03 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109908#msg-109908</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109908#msg-109908</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>Anders Green</strong><br/>
Interesting. RallySprint limitation: &quot;Maximum speeds on straights should not normally exceed 70 miles per hour for the fastest vehicles.&quot;<br />
<br />
Not the average for the stage, just an instantaneous 70 mph. How long would it take for a &quot;medium strength&quot; turbo awd car to reach this? It seems like it would take most &quot;proper stages&quot; out of contention?<br />
<br />
Anders</div></blockquote>
<br />
Interestingly when the issue came up for RallyCross (damn spikycaps) it turned out the 60mph was a sustained speed and not a momentary blip.<br />
<br />
I've seen over that, in smooth and straight sections, but the problem is some people don't know how to design for shit so they might make a long sweeping curve with lumps in it so people are catching air sideways at high speed - which is a dealbreaker.<br />
<br />
One year at Nationals (no points for guessing correctly) some people went on course walk and made a game of pointing out how many rules violations there were...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:38:47 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109907#msg-109907</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109907#msg-109907</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Michel-the restriction on &quot;significant&quot;(whatever that means) elevation changes is on the RallyTrials course-not their RallySprint:<br />
<br />
 RallyTrials Courses<br />
1 RallyTrials courses shall be placed on relatively level, smooth dirt or gravel surfaces and shall<br />
avoid incorporating significant elevation changes or abrupt high-speed turns. Course design<br />
should normally provide a combination of flowing turns connected by short straight<br />
sections.<br />
2 Maximum speeds on straights should not normally exceed 60 miles per hour for the fastest<br />
vehicles.<br />
3 A 30 second penalty will be given if a course marker/pylon is upset or totally displaced. A 50<br />
second penalty will be given for each missed gate.<br />
4 Courses should be designed so that the entire course may be observed by course officials<br />
from one location. It is recommended that RallyTrials courses not exceed 1.5 miles in<br />
length.<br />
5 Like RallyCross, the course will be designated by upright and pointer cones. It is<br />
recommended that cone positions be marked with landscape flags (or similar) to ensure<br />
displaced cones are replaced in the proper location.<br />
6 The course must be located a reasonably safe distance from fixed objects and hazards, such<br />
as trees, poles, barriers, buildings, mounds, holes and ponds. The minimum recommended<br />
set-back for hazards on the inside of turns and along straights is at least 25 feet. The<br />
minimum recommended set-back for hazards on the outside of corners is at least 50 feet.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Here's their Rallysprint course rules:<br />
<br />
C RallySprint Courses<br />
1 RallySprint courses may be run on RallyTrials -type sites (e.g. large dirt/gravel parking lots)<br />
or on sections of dirt, gravel or snow-packed roads. Course design may allow somewhat<br />
faster speeds than RallyTrials events, but the emphasis should remain on vehicle handling,<br />
not top speed.<br />
2 Maximum speeds on straights should not normally exceed 70 miles per hour for the fastest<br />
vehicles. Chicanes may be used to control speeds on longer straight sections.<br />
3 Penalties should be minimally the same as RallyTrials.<br />
4 For RallySprint courses that are set up on large, open areas, the course will be designated by<br />
upright and pointer cones. For RallySprint courses that are set up on roads or trails, the<br />
roadway itself will designate the course and cones may be used to mark key course features,<br />
such as corner entries, hazards, gates and intersections.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>RALLYRS</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:26:12 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109906#msg-109906</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109906#msg-109906</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I think the idea is that bursts up to and over 70 are fine, but they're trying to discourage extended high speed segments. You know, miles of 4's and 5's.<br />
<br />
I have no idea why there's a prohibition on elevation changes or even what that's really supposed to mean. No off-camber turns? No long downhills that'll overheat brakes? I dunno.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>hoche</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:04:43 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109905#msg-109905</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109905#msg-109905</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ would there be a penalty if a driver went over 70 mph?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>tdrrally</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:58:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109904#msg-109904</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109904#msg-109904</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>Anders Green</strong><br/>
Interesting. RallySprint limitation: &quot;Maximum speeds on straights should not normally exceed 70 miles per hour for the fastest vehicles.&quot;</div></blockquote>
<br />
70 in an unrestricted turbo awd will come up really really quick (I didn't read the rules...restrictors required?).  I was well into 3rd gear in my Evo once at a CO-RX event...didn't have time to check the speedo because I was sawing back and forth at the wheel thru a stupid fast slalom trying not to take out the timing lights and the people sitting behind the timing table (this was at the event grant referenced from a few years back).  It looked like a safe place...until you drove the course.  Things got moved after the first run thru.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Dave]]></description>
            <dc:creator>DaveK</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 13:28:51 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109896#msg-109896</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109896#msg-109896</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Anders..yes I thought the 70mph max for the rallysprint was a bit conservative too(to put it mildly).]]></description>
            <dc:creator>RALLYRS</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:57:41 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109893#msg-109893</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109893#msg-109893</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Interesting. RallySprint limitation: &quot;Maximum speeds on straights should not normally exceed 70 miles per hour for the fastest vehicles.&quot;<br />
<br />
Not the average for the stage, just an instantaneous 70 mph. How long would it take for a &quot;medium strength&quot; turbo awd car to reach this? It seems like it would take most &quot;proper stages&quot; out of contention?<br />
<br />
Anders]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Anders Green</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:38:53 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109892#msg-109892</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109892#msg-109892</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Looks like it's time to develop some bolt in roll bar kits.  We actually talked about an Impreza one last Tuesday for Rallycross.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>NoCoast</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:32:01 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109891#msg-109891</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109891#msg-109891</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>RALLYRS</strong><br/>
So SCCA posted their RallyTrials and RallySprint rules:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://cdn.growassets.net/user_files/scca/downloads/000/011/662/2016_RallyTrialsRallySprint_Rules.pdf?1450124498" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://cdn.growassets.net/user_files/scca/downloads/000/011/662/2016_RallyTrialsRallySprint_Rules.pdf?1450124498</a><br />
<br />
I was happy to see they went with Time Trials Rules(just a 4 point roll bar) for the RallyTrials.<br />
Honestly it's just a slightly faster rallyx-no need for full cage...<br />
<br />
But...Bummer that the RallyTrials couse design can't have elevation changes..that probably wont bode well for using that trophy truck course I posted above...</div></blockquote>
<br />
What the fuck is &quot;elevation changes..Those faggotity SCCA types gonna have some laser-level and GPS and make sure the wawwy-twials is flat + or- .001&quot;..<br />
<br />
Does SCCA mandate that whoever writes their rules for everything be wearing double adult Depends? Do they do the whole  ultra-drag burlesque High Camp routiney, or just do the drama queen gig playing it straight..<br />
Elevation change..A bump is elevation change..]]></description>
            <dc:creator>john vanlandingham</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:03:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109889#msg-109889</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109889#msg-109889</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ So SCCA posted their RallyTrials and RallySprint rules:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://cdn.growassets.net/user_files/scca/downloads/000/011/662/2016_RallyTrialsRallySprint_Rules.pdf?1450124498" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://cdn.growassets.net/user_files/scca/downloads/000/011/662/2016_RallyTrialsRallySprint_Rules.pdf?1450124498</a><br />
<br />
I was happy to see they went with Time Trials Rules(just a 4 point roll bar) for the RallyTrials.<br />
Honestly it's just a slightly faster rallyx-no need for full cage...<br />
<br />
But...Bummer that the RallyTrials couse design can't have elevation changes..that probably wont bode well for using that trophy truck course I posted above...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>RALLYRS</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 18:35:57 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109589#msg-109589</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109589#msg-109589</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ .................<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Well...my local area(SoCal) now has a date for a RallyTrial at the same venue location as the bulk of our rallycrosses.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://myautoevents.com/pls/mae/frmEventDetail.Show?psevent_id=15682" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://myautoevents.com/pls/mae/frmEventDetail.Show?psevent_id=15682</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.dirally.com/forums/showthread.php?33903-2016-JayCom-Glen-Helen-Schedule-and-info&amp;p=417617&amp;posted=1#post417617" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >http://www.dirally.com/forums/showthread.php?33903-2016-JayCom-Glen-Helen-Schedule-and-info&amp;p=417617&amp;posted=1#post417617</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I'm excited-I want to run it!<br />
<br />
No final safety regs yet-but signs point to-maybe- only a 4 point roll bar....and possibly plus door bars.<br />
<br />
We will see.<br />
<br />
I suppose I should get my car running first ...before I worry about such things.<br />
<br />
<br />
Details:<br />
<br />
&quot;Sunday Jun 5th - RallyTrials at Glen Helen<br />
Yes, I said RallyTrials. Details are going to be in flux for quite a while, but the jist is as such: For Caged cars (may get reduced to roll bars), higher average speed, more &quot;opsticals&quot;, much longer course. Prelim design includes the trophy truck course. Scoring will be similar to RallyX, but this is not part of the Glen Helen Points series.&quot;<br />
<br />
<br />
I'm guessing -but it sounds like he(Jay-the organizer) may link the trophy truck course with the rallyx course.<br />
They are right next to each other.<br />
<br />
He has the RallyTrials running the day after the rallyx,so there shouldn't be any interference issues.<br />
<br />
<br />
I've rallyx'd the Focus before on the Trophy truck course.<br />
<br />
In March 2013 the Glen Helen Owners stole our normal rallyx course for parking for a last minute moto-x race and then luckily said we could use the Trophy Truck course.<br />
<br />
Our organizer placed cones on the Trophy Truck course to slow us down to rallyx speeds... but some cars still slightly left the ground in certain areas...<br />
<br />
Of course it was WAY MORE FUN than a flat parking lot!<br />
<br />
<br />
I had a giant class of 3 including myself in prepared 2wd that day...<br />
<br />
<br />
...........<br />
<br />
Lined up in front of my only two competitors in my class that day-the 911 and the Miata.<br />
The cars next to us are stock AWD:<br />
<a href="http://s289.photobucket.com/user/rallyrs1/media/glenhelentrophytruckcourse.jpg.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" ><img src="http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll215/rallyrs1/glenhelentrophytruckcourse.jpg" class="bbcode" border="0" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://s289.photobucket.com/user/rallyrs1/media/truckcourse.jpg.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" ><img src="http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll215/rallyrs1/truckcourse.jpg" class="bbcode" border="0" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
Not the most thrilling vid-but before all the awd action starts it shows the 911(stage car), then me in the Focus,then the organizer in his Miata..learning one of the Trophy truck course sweepers:<br />
<br />
<br/><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/sNc7ujamPQA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360"></embed><br/><br />
<br />
<br />
I managed to best the other two guys/cars in my big 'ol class of 3 that day.<br />
<br />
<br />
A better onboard vid of Verdier's run that day in just a SLIGHTLY quicker car:     ;)<br />
<br />
<br/><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/NPSmHucNEdc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360"></embed><br/>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>RALLYRS</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 14:12:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109373#msg-109373</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109373#msg-109373</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I did say 'for OVER 20 years' and chose 20 years as that is a timeframe that is relevant to most ralliests who remember the end of SCCA ProPony as the 'good ol days' with waiting lists for all sorts of rally events.  I am certainly aware of the decline in blue-collardom wages starting well before 1995]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Josh Wimpey</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 16:31:38 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109367#msg-109367</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109367#msg-109367</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>Josh Wimpey</strong><br/>
John,  You may be right but the economy for blue collar dudes has been in steady -- if not dramatic -- decline for over 20 years.  Couple that with increases in costs to run (for a variety of reasons) and you get dramatically fewer people moving into the sport through this route.  Even lowering the costs back to late 1990s specs and safety requirements won't bring many of them back to the sport.</div></blockquote>
<br />
Must be fun being so young and only thinking the decline for the people that make things has only been for the last 20 years..or so.....<br />
<br />
Real wages in constant dollars for skilled metal workers just to pull a random catagory that I have been in just a little <i><b>since 1970ish has gone down roughly 29-30% since about 1972</b></i>---despite the vast HUGE increase in productivity brought about by CNC machining and the modern ceramic--fancy ass indexable cutting tools...<br />
<br />
But for all y'allz who werent working in the bad old days of the Reagan Administration with out of control inflation (as a direct result of policies of the Nixon administration).. ...<br />
The trend, the convulsions were a decade old---and yet there were on average many more cars at every event and more importantly  MANY MORE EVENTS at low entry fees..<br />
7-9 in Washington state with a population pool---mostly blue collar (we used to make a lot of airplanes over there----&gt; about a mile and a half away) in Seattle and Portland of under 4 million.<br />
<br />
Now the population has doubled, per capita incomes are much higher, and the entries are skimpy---and theres 2-3 events in WA<br />
Max]]></description>
            <dc:creator>john vanlandingham</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 00:01:27 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109366#msg-109366</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109366#msg-109366</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>NoCoast</strong><br/>
<blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>Josh Wimpey</strong><br/>
The economy for blue collar dudes has been in steady -- if not dramatic -- decline for over 20 years.  Couple that with increases in costs to run (for a variety of reasons) and you get dramatically fewer people moving into the sport through this route.</div></blockquote>
<br />
Not to mention the increased cost of living in USA without a matching raise in income.<br />
I contend that many engineers and other desk jockeys are blue collar workers sucked into a white collar economy.  Rally attracts them as they want to build things and work with their hands and see physical manifestations of their labors.</div></blockquote>
<br />
And maybe that's why injur-nears are so frequently the build it forever, fret for weeks and spend stupid money over a 0,15% weight change etc. but ignore gross inefficiencies like lack of practice developing driving experience etc type guys.  <br />
Rally attract some---those that tend to stay---by something else: the drive..<br />
And everything else is secondary, just necessary evil to get that done...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>john vanlandingham</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 23:50:18 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109364#msg-109364</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109364#msg-109364</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>Josh Wimpey</strong><br/>
John,  You may be right but the economy for blue collar dudes has been in steady -- if not dramatic -- decline for over 20 years. </div></blockquote>
<br />
Ayup.  15 years ago, I was making more money in numerical dollars (not just adjusted dollars) than I am now, even though I've significantly moved up in the pay percentile.  In other words, I make more than most people in my line of work NOW, but I still make a lot less money than I used to make THEN.<br />
<br />
Yeah it is great that one can buy an awesome computer for $600 instead of $6000 but that doesn't help when one's retirement plan is &quot;hope Social Security isn't bankrupt, or at least die before you are too old to work anymore&quot;.<br />
<br />
Also, I recently <a href="http://www.theonion.com/article/bush-our-long-national-nightmare-of-peace-and-pros-464" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >found this</a> scarily prescient buit of satire.  From Jaunary 2001.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 21:14:34 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109361#msg-109361</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109361#msg-109361</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>Josh Wimpey</strong><br/>
The economy for blue collar dudes has been in steady -- if not dramatic -- decline for over 20 years.  Couple that with increases in costs to run (for a variety of reasons) and you get dramatically fewer people moving into the sport through this route.</div></blockquote>
<br />
Not to mention the increased cost of living in USA without a matching raise in income.<br />
I contend that many engineers and other desk jockeys are blue collar workers sucked into a white collar economy.  Rally attracts them as they want to build things and work with their hands and see physical manifestations of their labors.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>NoCoast</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:22:15 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109359#msg-109359</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109359#msg-109359</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>webkris</strong><br/>
<blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>Josh Wimpey</strong><br/>Even lowering the costs back to late 1990s specs and safety requirements won't bring many of them back to the sport.</div></blockquote>
<br />
A few points that often get piled together:<br />
<br />
1. We ALL know that car racing &amp; motorsport is inherently expensive - compared to MOST other hobbies there are a lot cheaper things to do than &quot;Spec Miata&quot;, &quot;Formula Ford&quot;, &quot;Nitro Dragster&quot; or &quot;Stage Rally&quot;. The every-man argument that &quot;Racing is expensive&quot;.<br />
<br />
2. We agree that competing at the top of the field in the open or unlimited class &quot;PRO&quot; is usually 10X - 100X more expensive than any amateur or club effort in the same sport. This also gets lumped into &quot;Racing is expensive&quot;.<br />
<br />
3. Realize that marketing the sport with only the top of the field and keeping those costs in the &quot;$250K - 1M&quot; by encouraging the advancement of the pointy end and thus discouraging participation by the amateur or club efforts lands in &quot;Racing is expensive&quot;.<br />
<br />
So - <br />
1. Consider that restoring WWII aircraft is also expensive.<br />
2. The size of your checkbook is and always will be a factor in racing.<br />
3. Some promoters and racing organizations are more interested in the team that can write an $80K check and do many national events, then getting 30 guys with $15K cars on the track at 1 or 2 local races paying with PayPal.<br />
<br />
My argument would be that &quot;rally is NOT more expensive&quot; in the last 20 years.<br />
It would be that the promotion and marketing of rally, shifted 20+ years ago to attract the top dollars - and even after 20 years of this, times when manufacturers and big team efforts would come and go, there just aren't &quot;that many people&quot; that are interested in rally AND that can write big checks every season.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>john vanlandingham</strong><br/>
A little reflection would lead one to the inescapable conclusion that there are many many many times more working class people than doctors, lawyers, injur-nears, etc.</div></blockquote>
<br />
I'm willing to bet that there are a hell of a lot more &quot;every-man teams&quot; that would be interested in this sport if it was actually marketed to them (<i>with classes and championships geared specifically towards them</i>). :) *cough... *grassroots<br />
<br />
- Kris</div></blockquote>
<br />
And as you well know, my sympathy is with those doing this sport themselves--on pump gas...<br />
The utter ridiculous fawning over 1% and the moronic endlessly repeated &quot;If we just get ________________ (fill in blank, choose any: Dubya Arsey, TV stars, washed up Extreme Sports He-rows, moar millionaire, 75% of the field all in blue Subies, 23 classes whadd evar) is pared to its essence the same thing as the mow-rons telling us &quot;Trickle down---if we cut all taxes to bazzilionaire they'll buy more stuff and that'll creat MOAR jobz and we'll all get rich&quot;<br />
<br />
And its worked about as well...growing amassing of riches flowing one way, larger gap between top and the average, less democratic participation..<br />
<br />
We've done the &quot;let's all suck the cocks of the Big Boys and give them what they want and that will save rally....30 years and particpation in constant numbers goes down, and in percentage of population, it keeps plummeting even more...<br />
<br />
Enough of the same old let's get some spoiled kids in and grow the sport.. They'll just take whats easy and then wander off..3,2 rallies and bye bye.<br />
<br />
Back to basics..<br />
Like what it seems NASA is pushing..<br />
I salute you.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>john vanlandingham</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:48:23 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109355#msg-109355</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109355#msg-109355</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>Josh Wimpey</strong><br/>Even lowering the costs back to late 1990s specs and safety requirements won't bring many of them back to the sport.</div></blockquote>
<br />
A few points that often get piled together:<br />
<br />
1. We ALL know that car racing &amp; motorsport is inherently expensive - compared to MOST other hobbies there are a lot cheaper things to do than &quot;Spec Miata&quot;, &quot;Formula Ford&quot;, &quot;Nitro Dragster&quot; or &quot;Stage Rally&quot;. The every-man argument that &quot;Racing is expensive&quot;.<br />
<br />
2. We agree that competing at the top of the field in the open or unlimited class &quot;PRO&quot; is usually 10X - 100X more expensive than any amateur or club effort in the same sport. This also gets lumped into &quot;Racing is expensive&quot;.<br />
<br />
3. Realize that marketing the sport with only the top of the field and keeping those costs in the &quot;$250K - 1M&quot; by encouraging the advancement of the pointy end and thus discouraging participation by the amateur or club efforts lands in &quot;Racing is expensive&quot;.<br />
<br />
So - <br />
1. Consider that restoring WWII aircraft is also expensive.<br />
2. The size of your checkbook is and always will be a factor in racing.<br />
3. Some promoters and racing organizations are more interested in the team that can write an $80K check and do many national events, then getting 30 guys with $15K cars on the track at 1 or 2 local races paying with PayPal.<br />
<br />
My argument would be that &quot;rally is NOT more expensive&quot; in the last 20 years.<br />
It would be that the promotion and marketing of rally, shifted 20+ years ago to attract the top dollars - and even after 20 years of this, times when manufacturers and big team efforts would come and go, there just aren't &quot;that many people&quot; that are interested in rally AND that can write big checks every season.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>john vanlandingham</strong><br/>
A little reflection would lead one to the inescapable conclusion that there are many many many times more working class people than doctors, lawyers, injur-nears, etc.</div></blockquote>
<br />
I'm willing to bet that there are a hell of a lot more &quot;every-man teams&quot; that would be interested in this sport if it was actually marketed to them (<i>with classes and championships geared specifically towards them</i>). :) *cough... *grassroots<br />
<br />
- Kris]]></description>
            <dc:creator>webkris</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:51:22 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109353#msg-109353</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109353#msg-109353</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ John,  You may be right but the economy for blue collar dudes has been in steady -- if not dramatic -- decline for over 20 years.  Couple that with increases in costs to run (for a variety of reasons) and you get dramatically fewer people moving into the sport through this route.  Even lowering the costs back to late 1990s specs and safety requirements won't bring many of them back to the sport.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Josh Wimpey</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:56:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109348#msg-109348</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109348#msg-109348</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>NoCoast</strong><br/>
The problem is, most are buying way too nice of cars, usually with a car payment.  They might come out to a rallycross once and then they decide it's too rough on their car or too much commitment so they bail.<br />
Next year I am going to put some new younger college students that are interested in rally into my Impreza rallycross car.  My 20 year old cousin and his friends, local engineering school's car club members, etc.  I made the comment the other day, every engineering or computer science student is a potential future customer.  Figuring out how to get the black tie industries more interested in rallying instead of track/vintage would be good too.  Doctors, lawyers, and such.  We have a fairly concentrated group of blue collar entrepreneurs, engineer types, and really smart vets as primary rally base around here the past few years.</div></blockquote>
<br />
Once again, people think of things which is directly trhas been for decades..<br />
And the opposite of what I saw when we here had typically 35-40 cars at every event out here, and even more in the NE.<br />
<br />
Virtually everybody involved more than the dreaded 3.2 rallies were with only a sprinkling of 2-4 guys were all working class ie electricians, mechanics, bodymen, machinists, welders, carpenters, contractors etc etc...Oddly enough very similar in moto-cross and even moreso in enduro.<br />
<br />
Where rally is small time, meaningless, and just a handful of participants is those places where it is primarily rich guys.<br />
<br />
A little reflection would lead one to the inescapable conclusion that there are many many many times more working class people than doctors, lawyers, injur-nears, etc.<br />
<br />
Further reflection about the class system and especially the whole role of status would make a thinking person pause at the implications of trying to convince people who want and expect status reinforcement that they should abandon the received ideas current in their class and enter a world where results are so dearly purchased.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>john vanlandingham</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:58:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109347#msg-109347</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109347#msg-109347</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ The problem is, most are buying way too nice of cars, usually with a car payment.  They might come out to a rallycross once and then they decide it's too rough on their car or too much commitment so they bail.<br />
Next year I am going to put some new younger college students that are interested in rally into my Impreza rallycross car.  My 20 year old cousin and his friends, local engineering school's car club members, etc.  I made the comment the other day, every engineering or computer science student is a potential future customer.  Figuring out how to get the black tie industries more interested in rallying instead of track/vintage would be good too.  Doctors, lawyers, and such.  We have a fairly concentrated group of blue collar entrepreneurs, engineer types, and really smart vets as primary rally base around here the past few years.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>NoCoast</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:36:20 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109338#msg-109338</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109338#msg-109338</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>NoCoast</strong><br/>
Having stage rallyists actively involved in the rallycross community leads to a higher percentage of transitions. </div></blockquote>
<br />
I agree with this.  I think in the Washington DC region rallycross a bunch of guys have crossed over in some capacity (crew, volunteer, competitor) just because there were stage rally guys around who needed help at stage events and were active in rallycross.  I would think rallycross events would be a great place for a stage rally guy to fish for crew guys and codrivers.  <br />
<br />
I think generally speaking, this is a transition time for US rally. When I was in college, No one had heard of it.  Now, car guys seem to at least have played one of the DIRT games or have seen some youtube footage and thought it was cool.  So, right now the US rally scene is seeking a suitable middle ground event that can serve as a stepping stone to actual Rally.  It's gonna take a while to see what sticks.<br />
<br />
As the kids grow up knowing Rally is out there, more folks will show up at events and this thing will build momentum over time if it's managed correctly. because of this DIRT games are probably doing more for US rally than most realize.<br />
<br />
If you love Rally and have a stage or rallycross car, get it out in the public eye as much as you can.  run a rallycross, do a couple car shows over the summer, whatever.  <br />
<br />
This is turning into a 'this will save rally' thread.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:56:32 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109334#msg-109334</guid>
            <title>Re: SCCA's &amp;quot;Stepped&amp;quot; plan for Rally in the USA-Good idea or bound to fizzle?</title>
            <link>https://www.rallyanarchy.com/phorum/read.php?1,109270,109334#msg-109334</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="bbcode"><div><small>Quote<br/></small><strong>KTurner</strong><br/>
<br />
I autox regularly (with the rally car), <b>I don't understand the serious autoxer</b>.</div></blockquote>
<br />
I grew up watching my parents autocross.  I don't understand it either.  Sure, they liked to win, and yes they put a lot of time and effort into it.  But then, my dad was a mechanic and it was part fun/competition and part marketing.  He also built and/or serviced a lot of the other cars (as well as rally and track cars).  But I do not recall ever hearing either of my parents get upset about losing.  I also had an aunt, uncle and cousin that occasionally autocrossed.  I started doing it when I was 18 and had a blast.  Gotta say, one of the most fun events I ran was when my dad and I just randomly showed up at an event (after he'd stopped running regularly) and ran his Maxima station wagon daily driver (automatic) and beat the guy that had been winning his class at every event the entire season.  The guy was furious.  I was pretty sure I beat him too, but back then I was still running in &quot;ladies&quot; class .  I can't remember when they finally made ladies class optional and I haven't been to an SCCA event in a milennia so dunno if they've finally gotten rid of it entirely or if it's still an option, the small club I still run with it still has it for those that want to use it.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>12xalt</dc:creator>
            <category>Rally Chat</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:44:42 -0600</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
