Morison Banned Ultra Moderator Location: Calgary, AB Join Date: 03/27/2009 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,798 Rally Car: (ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought) |
hudson Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > If this sort of thing was going on, I'd make it happen in 5. Out of curiosity, what do you see as the biggest difference between the two, (or, why would you try so much harder to make this happen over gravel forest rallies) I am really curious about what you see as the barrier to rally. First Rally: 2001 Driver (7), Co-Driver (44) Drivers (16) Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4) Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0) Last Updated, January 4, 2015 ![]()
|
fiasco Andrew Steere Senior Moderator Location: South Central Nude Hamster Join Date: 12/29/2005 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 2,008 Rally Car: too rich for my blood, share a LeMons car |
Morison Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > hudson Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > If this sort of thing was going on, I'd make > it happen in 5. > > Out of curiosity, what do you see as the biggest > difference between the two, (or, why would you try > so much harder to make this happen over gravel > forest rallies) > > I am really curious about what you see as the > barrier to rally. > > Nobody asked me, but I'll pipe up! 1) My current "job" is to take care of the kids and do the books/pay the bills for my wife's business...limits my discretionary income (although I blow it all on chainsaws, my street car and snowmobile). Guess I should have paid attention more in school and majored in something other than journalism and minored in something other than photography/art. Getting a mainstream corporate job would have helped, too. Oops. 2) Nearly $2,000 in safety gear to sit your ass in a rally car. HANS $700, Suit $500, Helmet $500. You know the next thing is going to be requiring and dating the $1,000 seats...yeah, you can do it cheaper right now, will you be doing it twice come 2011? 3) What I thought I could build for $5,000 will really cost $15,000. Maybe $10,000 if I cut a lot of corners. 4) Entry costs in US. Seems Canadian Nationals have the same entry as US regionals. WTF? Some events like New England Forest have done the super cheap early entry, which is good for getting some fence sitters on the other side. 5) Towing/travel. It's a big country, and making the rest of the rally experience for your family/service crew nice enough so they'd like to come back costs $$$. I was probably spoiled by my service crew experiences! 6) It's much easier to bitch and moan on interweb forums than to actually accomplish something. ![]() ![]() Don't know what these Amsterdam industrial park things cost to run. I just want to rally on a Folkrace budget. Andrew Steere Lyndeborough, NH KB1PJY |
Morison Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > > If this sort of thing was going on, I'd make > it happen in 5. > > Out of curiosity, what do you see as the biggest > difference between the two, (or, why would you try > so much harder to make this happen over gravel > forest rallies) > > I am really curious about what you see as the > barrier to rally. The difference is: I can see this happening within a few hours drive of anywhere. I can see a car that's good for a tarmac rally sprint event, also being good at many other kinds of events with little to no changes. I see way less cost over all.. less to no towing, at worst equal tire wear?, less gas, less chance of wrecking the car, less time to do.. What more do you want? Andrew M Onterrible 30ish |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Mod Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
hudson Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Morison Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > If this sort of thing was going on, I'd > make > > it happen in 5. > > > > Out of curiosity, what do you see as the > biggest > > difference between the two, (or, why would > you try > > so much harder to make this happen over > gravel > > forest rallies) > > > > I am really curious about what you see as > the > > barrier to rally. > > > The difference is: > > I can see this happening within a few hours drive > of anywhere. > > I can see a car that's good for a tarmac rally > sprint event, also being good at many other kinds > of events with little to no changes. > > I see way less cost over all.. less to no towing, > at worst equal tire wear?, less gas, less chance > of wrecking the car, less time to do.. > > What more do you want? > > Andrew McNally > Hamilton, ON > 29 Come on. Route: 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight May as well do it in a parking lot, then there could maybe be some different TYPE of curve. John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |
john vanlandingham Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Come on. > Route: > 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight 90 straight > 90 straight 90 straight 90 straight 180 straight > 90 straight > > May as well do it in a parking lot, then there > could maybe be some different TYPE of curve. I hear you john. Let's go over the route book to a bloody rally. Merge Straight Need coffee! Merge Straight HAVE TO PEEEEE!!! Merge Straight NEED MORE GASSSS!! Merge Straight what do you want? Andrew M Onterrible 30ish |
Morison Banned Ultra Moderator Location: Calgary, AB Join Date: 03/27/2009 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,798 Rally Car: (ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought) |
hudson Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > The difference is: > > I can see this happening within a few hours drive of anywhere. But with some hunting and effort, so could a good gravel rally-sprint if it had the competitor support. (There was a tarmac rally event at Shannonville earlier this year by the way) > I can see a car that's good for a tarmac rally sprint event, also being good at many other kinds of events with little to no changes. Good point but the guy that bought my RX7 went for several years converting the car back and forth from rally spec to road race spec as needed. He loved doing double duty with the car but did eventually get his hands on a dedicated race shell which would serve as a 'back-up' rally shell (and vice-versa.) I'll point out that he isn't made of money either and the builds are both 'econo' type builds but he still manages to have more fun than you can imagine in them. > I see way less cost over all.. less to no towing, at worst equal tire wear?, less gas, less chance of wrecking the car, less time to do.. I guess it all depends on how you want to approach your rally. I started by driving to and from the events in the rally car and know several teams locally that still do that and don't even own a service rig. When you consider the car would almost certainly be the same build in terms of safety equipment and you'd almost certainly be required to have the same personal safety gear,.. I think the costs will be closer than you think. Beyond that - I think the damage potential is different but not 'less,' but that would really depend on the venue itself. > What more do you want? I was merely curious of your perspective on it - thanks. First Rally: 2001 Driver (7), Co-Driver (44) Drivers (16) Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4) Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0) Last Updated, January 4, 2015 ![]()
|
Morison Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > But with some hunting and effort, so could a good > gravel rally-sprint if it had the competitor > support. (There was a tarmac rally event at > Shannonville earlier this year by the way) I guess I'm more stoked about the possibility of a LOCAL SPRINT kind of event. Something that was no more than a couple hours drive away and could be done and over with in a day. I had no idea about the Shannonville event.. but I don't have my ear close to the ground either. > Good point but the guy that bought my RX7 went for > several years converting the car back and forth > from rally spec to road race spec as needed. He > loved doing double duty with the car but did > eventually get his hands on a dedicated race shell > which would serve as a 'back-up' rally shell (and > vice-versa.) I'll point out that he isn't made of > money either and the builds are both 'econo' type > builds but he still manages to have more fun than > you can imagine in them. Having more than one active prepared car is simply not in the cards for me. Unless I had a setup that could be changed back and forth reasonably quickly and easily AND wasn't a massive compromise.. I don't see that being likely. > I guess it all depends on how you want to approach > your rally. I started by driving to and from the > events in the rally car and know several teams > locally that still do that and don't even own a > service rig. > > When you consider the car would almost certainly > be the same build in terms of safety equipment and > you'd almost certainly be required to have the > same personal safety gear,.. I think the costs > will be closer than you think. > > Beyond that - I think the damage potential is > different but not 'less,' but that would really > depend on the venue itself. I mostly agree with you.. I however see the potential for massive damage a lot higher on gravel if there is something for your inertia to sink into. Don't forget under body protection and cleaning the damn car afterwards ![]() > > What more do you want? > > I was merely curious of your perspective on it - > thanks. I wasn't trying to be snippy.. just saying that a local sprint event that I could take my prepped "general fun" car to would be fairly close to the ultimate thing in what I think I would be looking for, had I the time and money. I see something like this as potentially quite fun, low cost, and low risk: Note the safety gear. Andrew M Onterrible 30ish |
Pete Pete Remner Infallible Moderator Location: Cleveland, Ohio Join Date: 01/11/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 2,022 |
|
Dazed_Driver Banned Mod Moderator Location: John and Skyes Magic Love liar Join Date: 08/24/2007 Posts: 2,154 |
hudson Wrote:
> I mostly agree with you.. I however see the > potential for massive damage a lot higher on > gravel if there is something for your inertia to > sink into. > > Andrew McNally > Hamilton, ON > 29 If you're going the same speed, I would say your damage will be roughly egual. However, you can get up to speed faster on tarmac because of the traction, and possibly (probably?) higher speeds... which is fine, until the tires give out and you go sideways into a building at 130mph (I use this as I have personally seen my cousins WRX with a spec C swap in it accelerate from a standstill to 120 in ridiculously short distances. That car is nuts.) I'd think just for that reason, tarmac COULD have more damage, but in general, the damage levels would be similar, but different. Unless you hit a very solid street lamp/power line pole it will be hard to recreate sideways into a tree, but for any head on hit, which would be more likely on tarmac as most cars wont be sliding as much, I think it would be about the same. Welcome to the cult of JVL drink the koolaid or be banned. |
Dazed_Driver Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > If you're going the same speed, I would say your > damage will be roughly egual. However, you can get > up to speed faster on tarmac because of the > traction, and possibly (probably?) higher > speeds... which is fine, until the tires give out > and you go sideways into a building at 130mph (I > use this as I have personally seen my cousins WRX > with a spec C swap in it accelerate from a > standstill to 120 in ridiculously short distances. > That car is nuts.) > > I'd think just for that reason, tarmac COULD have > more damage, but in general, the damage levels > would be similar, but different. Unless you hit a > very solid street lamp/power line pole it will be > hard to recreate sideways into a tree, but for any > head on hit, which would be more likely on tarmac > as most cars wont be sliding as much, I think it > would be about the same. > > Feisty Peacock? I'm not arguing that.. I'm thinking that the likelihood when driving at 9.5 tenths of losing control to the point at which you hit something seems to me to be greater on a gravel rally stage than on asphalt. Andrew M Onterrible 30ish |
Dazed_Driver Banned Mod Moderator Location: John and Skyes Magic Love liar Join Date: 08/24/2007 Posts: 2,154 |
|
Pete Pete Remner Infallible Moderator Location: Cleveland, Ohio Join Date: 01/11/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 2,022 |
But on dry pavement, when the tires break loose it still isn't all-or-nothing. As an extreme example look at guys who drift, they don't just pirouette off in a straight line. The slip angles are lots smaller than on gravel or dirt, true, but the idea's the same.
Pete Remner Cleveland, Ohio 1984 RX-7 (rallycross thing) 1978 Silence is golden, but duct tape is silver. |
Dazed_Driver Banned Mod Moderator Location: John and Skyes Magic Love liar Join Date: 08/24/2007 Posts: 2,154 |
well, yes. That's a good point too. I don't know. Drifting is actually a lot slower then most people think. Where as a triple digit slide.. I mean, they're recoverable, sure, but it's a LOT harder. Look at F1 cars, or other road race spin outs (Not going to use Nascar, as they are only set up for turning left... unless its a road course, so the countersteering maybe compromised) as an extreme example to counter your extreme example, haha.
Welcome to the cult of JVL drink the koolaid or be banned. |
Pete Pete Remner Infallible Moderator Location: Cleveland, Ohio Join Date: 01/11/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 2,022 |
Ah, now we're getting into car setup!
![]() I'd also think that rally tarmac tires are a lot more forgiving than circuit racing tires given the different nature of what's expected of them. Circuit racing tires tend to have rather sharp traction curves since the idea is to NOT slide the car at all, and the drivers have a vested interest in not scrubbing the tires any more than absolutely necessary. Pete Remner Cleveland, Ohio 1984 RX-7 (rallycross thing) 1978 Silence is golden, but duct tape is silver. |
Carl S Carl Seidel Junior Moderator Location: Fe Mtn, MI Join Date: 02/10/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 765 Rally Car: 1993 honderp |
hudson Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > I see something like this as potentially quite > fun, low cost, and low risk: > > > > Note the safety gear. > > > Andrew McNally > Hamilton, ON > 29 Looks like an autocross to me. Mostly 2nd gear with short bursts of 3rd in a car that would appear to be geared pretty tight. |