Rally Chat
Don\
Welcome! Log In Register

Advanced

Starting order

Posted by heymagic 
heymagic
Banned
Infallible Moderator
Location: La la land
Join Date: 01/25/2006
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 3,740

Rally Car:
Not a Volvo


Starting order
December 24, 2009 07:29PM
So all it takes for me to get a customer in the door is to call JVL. Everytime it is quiet for a minute and I think to call him 2 or 3 people show up. Even today.

We were discussing inverting the start orders. With todays speed factors the slow guy would be pursued by someone only very slightly faster. So no one should be able to catch the guy in front. Maybe put a little time on them is all. You never have any guarantee that you won't catch a car or two on stage anyway. Benefits would be the slow guys with small budgets, marginal tires and cheap shocks would have better conditions to rally on. Slower cars would have more opportunity to get viewed and photographed because the crowds would stay to see the fast guys. Stage workers would have the slow guys to get warmed up on before the fast cars come thru. Spectators would continually get to see faster and faster cars rather than the opposite. The field would always tighten rather than stretch out. The road would be swept for the fast guys, we could still allow dust minutes when needed. The deteriorated roads might slow the faster guys down to compensate for the road being swept. Also as the field progressed the faster cars often have more experienced crews, so better if someone has an off and needed help.

Waddaya think??
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Rallymech
Robert Gobright
Senior Moderator
Location: White Center Seattle
Join Date: 04/27/2008
Age: Possibly Wise
Posts: 1,292

Rally Car:
91 VW GTI 8V


Re: Starting order
December 24, 2009 07:42PM
Excellent idea.



Robert.

"You are way too normal to be on Rally Anarchy." Eddie Fiorelli.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
randyzimmer
randy zimmer
Godlike Moderator
Location: Buffalo, NY
Join Date: 03/12/2006
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 196

Rally Car:
rallycross 13B Miata



Re: Starting order
December 24, 2009 07:48PM
First, Merry Christmas and I hope everyone gets all the rally gear they need to enter all their local events and maybe even a little more.

Everything you say sounds wonderful. Running in reverse order fixes all the things you mention.
In practice, I think I've been involved in at least three tries of this tactic and I remember vividly that two of them ended very badly.

Perhaps the pressure of leading the pack puts an emotional strain on the driver as he worries about being a star to the assembled masses while trying to stay ahead of "potentially" faster cars behind. They crumble, make stupid mistakes and get the whole stage red flagged or worse. One ran a whole three cars before the big off and the other ran all the way with the 1st seed taking to the woods to get around a 10 car blockage. Pretty exciting.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
NoCoast
Grant Hughes
Ultra Moderator
Location: Whitefish, MT
Join Date: 01/11/2006
Age: Midlife Crisis
Posts: 6,818

Rally Car:
BMW



Re: Starting order
December 24, 2009 10:01PM
One of my favorite arguments against this that I've heard was that the top guys might get delayed because of a problem with one of the slower guys. Seems like it happens pretty frequently the other direction though.

My personal preference is that the start order remains the same, but you seperate out 2WD and AWD. Running 2WD first gives all the spectators time to get in place for the AWD guys. I've seen quite a few late comers that miss the top few cars, who seeing was really why they just hiked 2+ miles up the side of some mountain near Mt Hood. Plus it gives the 2WD guys the ability to market themselves a little more AND it seperates out the two groups that are inherintly so different.



Grant Hughes
Please Login or Register to post a reply
12xalt
"oh! you're the one!"
Mod Moderator
Location: Hazel Dell, WA
Join Date: 02/22/2008
Age: Possibly Wise
Posts: 1,390

Rally Car:
1974 Dodge Colt, under construction



Re: Starting order
December 24, 2009 10:50PM
I think that's cool but for one thing

the slower guys who need to be pulled out by sweep and then are currently allowed to continue on their way if able, if they run first, they probably won't be fast enough to not be time barred by the time sweep comes through to help them on their way
Please Login or Register to post a reply
heymagic
Banned
Infallible Moderator
Location: La la land
Join Date: 01/25/2006
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 3,740

Rally Car:
Not a Volvo


Re: Starting order
December 24, 2009 11:36PM
12xalt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think that's cool but for one thing
>
> the slower guys who need to be pulled out by sweep
> and then are currently allowed to continue on
> their way if able, if they run first, they
> probably won't be fast enough to not be time
> barred by the time sweep comes through to help
> them on their way

True, but one should never count on being pulled out by sweep and being able to finish. The fast cars could benefit the same also and since they may spend several times the amount to get there it might be better if they were pulled out. The other, bigger issue with sweep saving competitors has to do with safety. It might pressure sweep to travel faster than needed in hopes of saving someone. Basically if you don't want to be time barred stay on the road.


Please Login or Register to post a reply
Dazed_Driver
Banned
Junior Moderator
Location: John and Skyes Magic Love liar
Join Date: 08/24/2007
Posts: 2,154



Re: Starting order
December 25, 2009 12:14AM
heymagic Wrote:
Basically if you don't want to be time
> barred stay on the road.
>
>
>


God damn it, who let some guy with common sense in here?



Welcome to the cult of JVL drink the koolaid or be banned.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
derek
Derek Bottles
Elite Moderator
Location: Lopez Island/ Seattle WA
Join Date: 12/20/2005
Age: Possibly Wise
Posts: 853

Rally Car:
Past: 323, RX2, GTI. Next up M3 ?



Re: Starting order
December 25, 2009 11:45AM
I think there are cases for both might even mix it up from time to time, like on the turn around stage smith creek.





In the long run reality always wins.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Carl S
Carl Seidel
Godlike Moderator
Location: Fe Mtn, MI
Join Date: 02/10/2006
Age: Midlife Crisis
Posts: 765

Rally Car:
1993 honderp


Re: Starting order
December 25, 2009 12:19PM
heymagic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Waddaya think??

You said, in the "Spec WRX" thread, "Unfortunately we must follow accepted practices to minmize risk."

This idea seems to contradict that statement. The only time I could think of running reverse order could qualify as an accepted practice is on super specials.

Personally I dont care where I am on the road, as long as I'm on the road. If there are 5 or 500 people at the spectator spots it makes no difference to me.

But what do you do with a car thats has running issues and is really slow and checks in 15 minutes late to the next stage and is now in the middle of a bunch of fast guys?
Please Login or Register to post a reply
heymagic
Banned
Infallible Moderator
Location: La la land
Join Date: 01/25/2006
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 3,740

Rally Car:
Not a Volvo


Re: Starting order
December 25, 2009 12:55PM
Carl S Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> heymagic Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Waddaya think??
>
> You said, in the "Spec WRX" thread, "Unfortunately
> we must follow accepted practices to minmize
> risk."
>
> This idea seems to contradict that statement. The
> only time I could think of running reverse order
> could qualify as an accepted practice is on super
> specials.
>
> Personally I dont care where I am on the road, as
> long as I'm on the road. If there are 5 or 500
> people at the spectator spots it makes no
> difference to me.
>
> But what do you do with a car thats has running
> issues and is really slow and checks in 15 minutes
> late to the next stage and is now in the middle of
> a bunch of fast guys?

Good point. There is no guarantee right now that one of the fast guys won't have issues and be a hazard to navigation for the other fast guys. No real difference is there? The road is never truely closed. Starting fast cars first is more of a reward system than safety system. Besides the running order can always be modified to deal with issues like that.

In pretty much all motorsports fast cars have to regularly deal with slower cars. Lapped cars, pit stops, equipment issues and so on. Many circle track events invert the field from time to time anyway. I caught and passed 6 cars one event in Canada, on stage in the dark. I caught Goochs rally truck 5 miles in on a 12 mile stage and they weren't having problems. Happens still.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Anders Green
Anders Green
Elite Moderator
Location: Raleigh, NC
Join Date: 03/30/2006
Age: Possibly Wise
Posts: 1,478

Rally Car:
Parked



Re: Starting order
December 26, 2009 09:40AM
I've done this at a rally I organized, and I won't do it again.

The safety issue is that the slow guys are also the less experienced guys. They will do a worse job of getting out triangles quickly and properly. We had some very close calls, and the response to post-rally interviews the along the lines of "I just didn't know that people would be going that fast", and that's just not the kind of thing you can teach.

Also, you increase the likelihood of cars in the road making trouble for other cars. "But Anders" you say "since each car is independent of all others, doesn't the statistical likelihood of any one car crashing remain the same?" Yes, but that's not what I said. I'm talking about crashed cars interfering with other cars. Fast cars, when they crash, are much more likely to leave the road entirely given their rate of speed. They won't cause a problem for cars behind them. Slower cars are more likely to be at the edge of the road. However, the slower cars are much further down the slope of "how much grip is there versus how much am I using". Running in reverse puts (not "would put"winking smiley more cars on the edge of the road that will be _experienced_ by other cars.

There ARE neat promotional and "fairness" reasons to run in reverse order, but in my opinion they are not large enough to overcome the other problems on forest stages. On non-forest stages they should be considered, certainly.

Happy New Year everyone!!! smiling smiley

Anders



Grassroots rally. It's what I think about.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Rallymech
Robert Gobright
Senior Moderator
Location: White Center Seattle
Join Date: 04/27/2008
Age: Possibly Wise
Posts: 1,292

Rally Car:
91 VW GTI 8V


Re: Starting order
December 26, 2009 10:50AM
I think that there is an argument to be made that competitors will learn get their shit together. If all the events were run like this it would not take long.



Robert.

"You are way too normal to be on Rally Anarchy." Eddie Fiorelli.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
john vanlandingham
John Vanlandingham
Junior Moderator
Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA
Join Date: 12/20/2005
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 14,152

Rally Car:
Saab 96 V4



Re: Starting order
December 26, 2009 11:34AM
And I gotta take issue with Anders about it is more likely the lesser crews who are lax or whatever about getting the triangles out after a stuff.
In my own extreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeemmmley limited experience it cannot be said with ANY certainty who is going to be good or bad with the triangles BUT!
I have brought up the lack of triangles several times to idiots who did not have triangles up when I was starting even 20-25 minuteds behinds them (At dual national+club events) and I will say I have gotten FAR LAMER EXCUSES from the higher seeded drivers/co drivers, and downright bullshit answwers from some 'been around for centuries " Midwest guys.


The difference is that most people not connected with an actual incident defend the so called "fast guys" almost invariably with bullsdhit like "Well, son, you see I'm shore they didn't think they'd be there that long....." (pat on head)

Bullshit.

Nope thinking back as i write, gotta say I've seen personally more problem with higher seed crews ---then again I usually worked my way up in events so I's dun't-a-know what's happening way at the back.

Howzat?



John Vanlandingham
Sleezattle, WA, USA

Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

www.rallyrace.net/jvab
CALL +1 206 431-9696
Remember! Pacific Standard Time
is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
heymagic
Banned
Infallible Moderator
Location: La la land
Join Date: 01/25/2006
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 3,740

Rally Car:
Not a Volvo


Re: Starting order
December 26, 2009 12:04PM
Not sure I view the faster is better when they crash scenario. I've seen plenty of fast cars wreck and block the road or worse... require medical assistance.

If we can teach chimps to go into space we can teach beginners to put out triangles,, well in theory.

If we reversed the field properly the speed differential woouldn't be that great. It would increase gradually. If it looked to be a problem initially a window could be put in.

An added minor benefit JVL pointed out is the learning benefit from getting passed by a faster competitor. One big drawback to rally is the isolated crews. On a road course or cricle track you can watch and learn from the cars in front of you. Rally typically lacks that. People can go for years and not learn correct braking points or when to toss a car. It isn't intuitive for lots of people.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
john vanlandingham
John Vanlandingham
Junior Moderator
Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA
Join Date: 12/20/2005
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 14,152

Rally Car:
Saab 96 V4



Re: Starting order
December 26, 2009 12:44PM
heymagic Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not sure I view the faster is better when they
> crash scenario. I've seen plenty of fast cars
> wreck and block the road or worse... require
> medical assistance.
>
> If we can teach chimps to go into space we can
> teach beginners to put out triangles,, well in
> theory.

I've always felt the whole triangle thing needs to be stressed a awful lot more at Nervous Novice classes and refresher reminders at driver's meeting with clear words sumpin like "EVERYBODY SHALL put out the triangles as son as you stuff----the rules state ......., not "you must , unless you're fighting for a class win or unless you thought you wouldn'r be there that long etc" "You went off there, then that means there's some chance that somebody else my make a similar goof and stuff it right there, too---in fact they may just fawk up cause they come upon you and they break their concentration---and then go off"
"If we get reports of cars off with no triangles---and OK signs, you will get your pee-pee whacked right on the end where it hurts more at the awards right in front of everybody" (blush)
>
> If we reversed the field properly the speed
> differential woouldn't be that great. It would
> increase gradually. If it looked to be a problem
> initially a window could be put in.
>
> An added minor benefit JVL pointed out is the
> learning benefit from getting passed by a faster
> competitor. One big drawback to rally is the
> isolated crews. On a road course or cricle track
> you can watch and learn from the cars in front of
> you. Rally typically lacks that. People can go for
> years and not learn correct braking points or when
> to toss a car. It isn't intuitive for lots of
> people.

Yep this is predicated on the idea we can convince folks that it's OK if there are people in the world who are faster than US, and so to stress "If you get caught, Pull OVER. Our road permissions and insurance are predicated on the idea that we're not head-to-head racing so if the guy behind has reeled you in by a full MINUTE, then he's faster, no big deal, just pull over----and then just on his tail and try and hang with him to watch how deep he goes, how soon he's on the gas etc.
Turn getting caught into an OPPORTUNITY you don't ordinarily have to study your competitor and how they drive."


None of what we do is intuitive except crying and suckling!

What we are trying to do is get our driving so that it becomes the next best to intuitive, and that's "reflexive" and that takes PRACTICE and REINFORCEMENT, lots of both of those.

And we should be trying to make PULLING THE FAWK OVER when caught equally a reflexive move..

And for any anomalies, like some guy is just unusually fast, there is always available re-seed and hopping over at ATC which should be simple if we TRAIN and REINFORCE the idea that there's no loss of dong size if somebody is quicker.
You're still a manly man and driving cars is still the other thing that you're "better than average" at. winking smiley





John Vanlandingham
Sleezattle, WA, USA

Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

www.rallyrace.net/jvab
CALL +1 206 431-9696
Remember! Pacific Standard Time
is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login