SteelSolutions William Timmins Junior Moderator Location: Redmond WA Join Date: 02/26/2008 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 648 Rally Car: 3 xr4ti/74 capri/02 bug eye |
|
Doivi Clarkinen Banned Mod Moderator Location: the end of the universe Join Date: 02/12/2006 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,432 Rally Car: 1980 Opel Ascona B |
|
GB Gord B Elite Moderator Location: Ontario, Canada Join Date: 01/17/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 80 Rally Car: None at this time |
Why the hell would you put a Sub A Rat motor into a Porsche ![]() ![]() |
DR1665 Brian Driggs Elite Moderator Location: Glendale Join Date: 06/08/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 832 Rally Car: Keyboard. Deal with it. |
I think it has something to do with the Subie lump being more affordable, more reliable, more efficient, and more powerful than the lump what originally come in the car.
Brian Driggs | KG7KCA | PHX, AZ | 89 Pajero alterius non sit qui suus esse potest |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Super Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
Fixed that for you. Could be that some people care about the facade and false status of having a Portch, but don't care about ruining a car by shoving some cheap lightly built thing into a car which really does work good. |
Doivi Clarkinen Banned Mod Moderator Location: the end of the universe Join Date: 02/12/2006 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,432 Rally Car: 1980 Opel Ascona B |
More affordable? I'll give you that, but most Porsche owners (at least of the six cylinder variety) aren't so concerned about that but would definitely be concerned about putting in a Japanese engine that would greatly devalue the car. As for your other assertions, you really don't know what you're talking about, do you? How many times has Subaru won the 24 hours of LeMans or the 12 hours of Sebring, again? Oh that's right, zero. Porsche has a long history of endurance racing success and has been winning races (and yes, rallies) since long before Subaru started making cars that weren't a complete joke so your assertion that a Subaru engine is somehow more reliable is just silly. As for being more powerful, well that's just too ludicrous to address. Or maybe I just got trolled... |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Super Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
I don't know if he was joking but he's down in the AZ desert so maybe he just popped some peyote buttons and was in the Dream World without his Yaqui master to be his guide... You know i keep a Subaru 2.2 crank just to show people what a piece of shit weak shit it is, and of course there's Subaru rods etc. Near fraudulent that they call this weak shit car parts... Portch 911 parts now. I'm serious now, always said when ever i see something like the rods OI, now there's a rod (actually you know me Daver I'd do the Curly thing not nyuk nyuk nyuk but when he's scared---howdya write that) I'd say the two powerplants 911 vs EJ are POLAR OPPOSITES. |
Jon Burke Jon Burke Senior Moderator Location: San Francisco, CA Join Date: 01/03/2008 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,402 Rally Car: Subaru w/<1000 crashes |
well, lets give'm the benefit of the doubt and assume he's talking about an actual Porsche boxer engine (I assume that's what's in the photo? NOT a 911?)
stock suby? yes, everything you said...but its not difficult these days to pop in some forged pistons, rods, etc (sti crank is pretty decent), upgrade your turbo and a few other ancilarry things and get 400whp reliably. In a little boxer roadster that could be fun. NOW, compare that to a Porsche 911 or greater engine? yeah....I personally wouldn't go there nor do I have the knowledge to even try. My old 911SC's flat 6 was fun as hell way past the normal life of any subaru engine (built or not)....definitely a high maintenance bitch though! (and I loved every minute of working on that thing) |