Rally Chat
Don\
Welcome! Log In Register

Advanced

Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online

Posted by Morison 
Ferdinand
Ferdinand Trauttmansdorff
Super Moderator
Location: Ottawa, ON
Join Date: 12/08/2007
Age: Ancient
Posts: 59


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 01:54PM
Quote
Morison
... when have you seen a Canadian national event have 3 Gr5 cars finish? Start? I'll even give you regionals...
It has been my impression there hasn't been a full podium of Gr5 cars ever, by all means show me I'm wrong.

Ya know there's this new-fangled thing called the internet, which has all sorts of useful stuff in it.

I'll list the Group5 cars competing at just the events to which I've been as co-driver. I'm not going to do the research for every Cdn National, or Regional, event starting all the way back from "ever". I'll leave that to you. I'm sure the CARS rules committee must already have done this, correct??? Try starting at: http://www.rallyscoring.com/


CRC = Canadian Rally Championship
CRQ = Championnat de Rallye du Québec
OPRC= Ontario Performance Rally Championship
RA = Rally America
Cdn/US cross-border entries are marked in RED.

2007
CRC-Tall Pines
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
BMW 2002 - Richard Szmidt

2008
CRC-Perce Neige
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Pontiac Sunbird - Michael Lavoie

CRQ-Rallye Sanair
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

CRC-Baie-des-Chaleurs
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Dodge SRT4 - Raphaël Guité
Dodge Conquest - Conor Malone
Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart - Zbigniew Szewczyk
Mazda Speed 3 - Tim O'Neil

CRC-Défi Ste-Agathe
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Dodge SRT4 - Raphaël Guité
Dodge Conquest - Conor Malone
Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart - Zbigniew Szewczyk

CRC-Tall Pines
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey
BMW 2002 - Richard Szmidt

2009
CRC -Perce Neige
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

OPRC-Lanark Highlands
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey

OPRC-Black Bear
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

RA -New England Forest Rally
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Mazda Speed3 - Wyatt Knox
Saab 99 - Luke Sorensen
Mazda 323 - Tom Barton
VW Rabbit TDi - Justin Carven
Acura Integra - Matt Johnston
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey

OPRC-Galway-Cavendish
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

CRC -Tall Pines
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf TDi - Michael Hordijk
Volvo 244 - Dave Marzetti

2010
OPRC-Lanark Highlands
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Dodge SRT4 - Thierry Menegoz

OPRC-Black Bear
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

RA -New England Forest Rally
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Mazda 3 - Lucy Block
Ford Fiesta - Dillon Van Way
Dodge SRT4 - Lauchlin O'Sullivan
Ford Focus - Michael Reilly
Mazda 323 - Tom Barton
Mazda Speed3 - Eric Burmeister
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey

CRC -Tall Pines
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf - Glen Clarke

2011
OPRC-Lanark Highlands
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey
VW Rabbit TDi - Justin Carven

VW Golf - Lance Webb

OPRC-Black Bear
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf - Lance Webb

RA -New England Forest Rally
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Ford Focus - Michael Reilly
Saab 99 - Luke Sorensen
Dodge SRT4 - Doug Shepherd
Merkur XR4Ti - Tim Chevalier
VW Rabbit TDi - Justin Carven
Mazda Speed3 - Wyatt Knox
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey
Scion xD - Andrew Comrie-Picard
Geo Metro - Phillip McGee
Ford Fiesta - Dillon Van Way

CRC -Tall Pines
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf - Lance Webb
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey
Ford Fiesta - Dillon Van Way

Mitsubishi Lancer - Jan Zedril

2012
CRC -Perce Neige
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

OPRC-Lanark Highlands
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf - Lance Webb
VW Golf - Patrick Rainville

OPRC-Black Bear
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf - Patrick Rainville

OPRC-Galway-Cavendish
VW Golf - Lance Webb
VW Golf - Jeannie MacGillivray
Dodge Conquest - Conor Malone

I reiterate, that list of Gr5 cars is just from the events of which I have personal knowledge. Yes Gr5 has been under-represented at many events. But it's a stretch to pretend that there have never been 3 or more at any event.

Until we go to Black River Stages next week, our only experience so far with US rallies has been at the New England Forest Rally. Gr5 is certainly far more popular in the U.S., and some American Gr5 competitors have made forays into Canadian events.

The sudden new CARS regulation is unlikely to encourage greater participation from our American Gr5 friends, and a 32mm restrictor is not going to improve our chances when competing at NEFR with the Nissan.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/11/2012 02:01PM by Ferdinand.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Morison
Banned
Godlike Moderator
Location: Calgary, AB
Join Date: 03/27/2009
Age: Ancient
Posts: 1,798

Rally Car:
(ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought)


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 02:10PM
Quote
RWD4ME
Keith you mentioned that at one point discussions were had about tires in order to lower speeds, then weight was looked at and both were discounted as unsafe.
There is no where in the original CARS release that mentions anything about speed.
Mainly because speed was one of several factors. If I left the impression that speed was a primary consideration then I either mis-spoke or wasn't clear. That said, even if it wasn't mentioned, it was a consideration the board, if not the committee.

Quote
RWD4ME
Whats expensive about a 2.3L turbo or for that fact a 5.0L NA that's unrestricted. It's all old technology that's plentiful in the wrecking yards around North America.
Plentiful + Wrecking yard = Affordable
Yet in two of the six years Gr5 has been around there hasn't been enough entries to award the championship and it looks like 2012 will probably also go unawarded unless someone decides to do both PFR and Pines, which means 7,000 km of towing.
Interestingly, the Ontario Championship shows 5 Gr5 drivers (although at least one was a rental) scoring this year (2 last year) but still has 10 Gr2 drivers. (4 last year)

Quote
RWD4ME
If speed was a consideration then why is that not mentioned in the CARS release?
Because this was a wholesale revision. That suggests everything was a consideration.

Quote
RWD4ME
At the end of the day, isn't Rally about having fun on the stages and not solely driven by the desire to get onto a podium?
Yes and no. Few of us would be doing this if we weren't 'competitive' types.

Quote
RWD4ME
Mt. Trials is regional I know... but why has it been canceled in the last couple of years?
Too few entrants?
Entry numbers had nothing to do with the cancellations.
One year was fire hazard level.
Two years were a lack of people deluded enough to help organise the event. (I understand PFR is struggling for 'day of' volunteers as well)


Quote
RWD4ME
This new 4 class structure will = few entries
As did HANS Devices and FIA Seats. The hit from those was heavy for organisers and took, probably, four years to recover.

Quote
RWD4ME
Skye, the guy who started Rally Anarchy has an incomplete XR4Ti that when he finishes it may only be able to run it in the US.
Unless the competitors are successful in appealing to CARS to change the rules to allow larger displacement turbo engines.

Quote
RWD4ME
Since the classes are getting "combined", why only bump the displacement 100cc to 2.5L?
Oh yeah, that includes the 2.5L normally aspirated Subaru Boxer.
The whole thing stinks to me!
Actually, it also includes the 2.5l engines from VW, Mazda and others.



First Rally: 2001
Driver (7), Co-Driver (44)
Drivers (16)
Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4)
Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0)
Last Updated, January 4, 2015



Quote
john vanlandingham
Blame is for idiots. losers.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/11/2012 02:42PM by Morison.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Morison
Banned
Godlike Moderator
Location: Calgary, AB
Join Date: 03/27/2009
Age: Ancient
Posts: 1,798

Rally Car:
(ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought)


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 02:25PM
Quote
Ferdinand
I reiterate, that list of Gr5 cars is just from the events of which I have personal knowledge. Yes Gr5 has been under-represented at many events. But it's a stretch to pretend that there have never been 3 or more at any event.
Happy to stand corrected.
I even took a look back at the 2011 CRC standings and in terms of starters in G5 the count was 2,2,1,1,3,3. Finishers were 1,1,0,1,1,0. 12 entries total from 6 unique drivers. (G2 was 4,2,7,3,2,5 starters and 0,1,4,1,2,3 for finishers - 23 entries from 14 unique drivers.

2012, so far, is 1,2,0,0 for starters and 1,0,0,0 for finishers. 3 entries from 3 unique drivers nationally.

Quote
Ferdinand
The sudden new CARS regulation is unlikely to encourage greater participation from our American Gr5 friends, and a 32mm restrictor is not going to improve our chances when competing at NEFR with the Nissan.
Then get in touch with Darryl and Ray and make sure they hear your concerns and how you would like to see the new rules changed. If I were suitably pissed off I'd copy the entire board, and office, on my email. All the email addresses are available online.



First Rally: 2001
Driver (7), Co-Driver (44)
Drivers (16)
Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4)
Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0)
Last Updated, January 4, 2015



Quote
john vanlandingham
Blame is for idiots. losers.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/11/2012 02:27PM by Morison.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Morison
Banned
Godlike Moderator
Location: Calgary, AB
Join Date: 03/27/2009
Age: Ancient
Posts: 1,798

Rally Car:
(ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought)


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 02:28PM
One of the strange things happeing in this discussion is that people are saying that Gr5 cars are being restricted because the open class cars were going too fast and that it doesn't make any sense.
The thing is ... no one from CARS, or the class change committee, ever said Gr5 was being restricted because they are too fast in a global sense or that 'they' wanted to keep them slower than the open cars.

I've said before, but will reiterate, that the restrictor on Gr5 cars exists to work at leveling the playing field between Gr5 and Gr2 cars. By combining the classes, 2/3 of the competitors in the class are saddled with 'underdog' cars and are even more of an underdog without the resirictors. The argument that a well driven Gr2 car can beat a poorly driven Gr5 car doesn't fly. Competitive drivers will always make sure their cars are built to the class they are in and will maximise what they can do within their budgets. If the classes were merged without restrictions, Gr2 drivers would have to make major changes if they wanted to bring a gun to a gun fight.



First Rally: 2001
Driver (7), Co-Driver (44)
Drivers (16)
Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4)
Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0)
Last Updated, January 4, 2015



Quote
john vanlandingham
Blame is for idiots. losers.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/11/2012 02:41PM by Morison.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Ferdinand
Ferdinand Trauttmansdorff
Super Moderator
Location: Ottawa, ON
Join Date: 12/08/2007
Age: Ancient
Posts: 59


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 03:26PM
Quote
Morison
Yet in two of the six years Gr5 has been around there hasn't been enough entries to award the championship and it looks like 2012 will probably also go unawarded unless someone decides to do both PFR and Pines, which means 7,000 km of towing.
That has nothing to do with the Gr5 vs Gr2 issue, but is more a consequence of trying to manage a National championship in a country the size of Canada. How many of us can afford to do 7,000 km of towing?

We'd rather spend our money on fun local events, regardless of whether they are National, Regional, or even American. There are some really GREAT rallies nearby.

Quote
Morison
I even took a look back at the 2011 CRC standings and in terms of starters in G5 the count was 2,2,1,1,3,3. Finishers were 1,1,0,1,1,0. 12 entries total from 6 unique drivers. (G2 was 4,2,7,3,2,5 starters and 0,1,4,1,2,3 for finishers - 23 entries from 14 unique drivers.
That suggests there are roughly half as many Gr5 entries and drivers as Gr2.

Quote

2012, so far, is 1,2,0,0 for starters and 1,0,0,0 for finishers. 3 entries from 3 unique drivers nationally.
... and how many Gr2 in 2012? Was there a proportional drop in Gr2 as well?

Quote
Morison
Quote
Ferdinand
The sudden new CARS regulation is unlikely to encourage greater participation from our American Gr5 friends, and a 32mm restrictor is not going to improve our chances when competing at NEFR with the Nissan.
Then get in touch with Darryl and Ray and make sure they hear your concerns and how you would like to see the new rules changed. If I were suitably pissed off I'd copy the entire board, and office, on my email. All the email addresses are available online.
We're not yet "suitably pissed off". I don't even know yet what Martin's reaction to this is.

Unlike some people, we've not actually been eliminated by the new rule. It's just a matter of adding a 32mm restrictor and seeing what sort of difference that makes. This new rule popped up rather suddenly.

I'm just a co-driver. Car building and engine tuning is not my department. Martin will have to figure out how this affects us. He built the Nissan 240 because that's what he was familiar with. Forget trying to build anything to the Production Class rules. Way too picky and restrictive. Gr5 rules allowed for a cheap, reliable, FUN, and Open build.

I sort of understand the reasoning for the new 2wd restrictions, if you're trying to combine Gr5 and Gr2 into a single Open 2wd Class. There are some pretty slow Gr2 teams who would feel justifiably handicapped if tossed together into a single class with more powerful Gr5 cars. But those slow Gr2 teams are already getting their asses kicked, and will continue to, by the fastest Gr2 cars. In fact, all the Gr5 cars are also already getting whupped by those fastest Gr2 cars.

I still don't understand the point about trying to attract manufacturer interest in 2wd. Fiat won't enter unless we first eliminate, or hobble, Gr5? I don't get it.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Do It Sidewayz
Chris Martin
Godlike Moderator
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Join Date: 01/15/2006
Age: Midlife Crisis
Posts: 567

Rally Car:
E-85 powered Impreza


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 03:29PM
I still think the best comparison between Grp 2 and Grp 5 you could make would be Chris Duplessis and Will Orders.

Chris - As "prepped" of a Group 2 car we have....great suspension, good gearbox, great brakes, but maybe giving up some power.

Will - As "prepped" of a Group 5 car we have....good suspension, great gearbox, good brakes, and piles of power...most importantly no restrictor.

These guys have run 2 events, and come within seconds of each other.

Both obviously great drivers, pushing their cars.

2wd does a great job of equalizing the playing field itself.

The light/nimble group 2 cars, can put their modest power down, do great in the tight stuff, but run out of legs on more open roads.

The generally heavier and bigger group 5 cars, struggle to put the big power down which hurts in the tight stuff, but love the more open roads.

Put a 32mm on Will and he's going to cry...he'll still make big torque and spin the tires in the slow stuff, but where he used to make up time the motor will be struggling for air.

This has also been proved in MaxAttack in years past.

Allowing the bigger motors and scrapping the restrictor for Open 2wd will not hurt the competition...imho it will make it better. There was nothing wrong with taking the existing Group 2 and Group 5 class and saying "boy and girls, you are all fighting for the same hardware now, have at it"...pretty sure everyone would have just said "damn right, lets go!"



Chris
Please Login or Register to post a reply
john vanlandingham
John Vanlandingham
Elite Moderator
Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA
Join Date: 12/20/2005
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 14,152

Rally Car:
Saab 96 V4



Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 03:55PM
Quote
Ferdinand
Quote
Morison
... when have you seen a Canadian national event have 3 Gr5 cars finish? Start? I'll even give you regionals...
It has been my impression there hasn't been a full podium of Gr5 cars ever, by all means show me I'm wrong.

Ya know there's this new-fangled thing called the internet, which has all sorts of useful stuff in it.

I'll list the Group5 cars competing at just the events to which I've been as co-driver. I'm not going to do the research for every Cdn National, or Regional, event starting all the way back from "ever". I'll leave that to you. I'm sure the CARS rules committee must already have done this, correct??? Try starting at: http://www.rallyscoring.com/


CRC = Canadian Rally Championship
CRQ = Championnat de Rallye du Québec
OPRC= Ontario Performance Rally Championship
RA = Rally America
Cdn/US cross-border entries are marked in RED.

2007
CRC-Tall Pines
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
BMW 2002 - Richard Szmidt

2008
CRC-Perce Neige
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Pontiac Sunbird - Michael Lavoie

CRQ-Rallye Sanair
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

CRC-Baie-des-Chaleurs
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Dodge SRT4 - Raphaël Guité
Dodge Conquest - Conor Malone
Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart - Zbigniew Szewczyk
Mazda Speed 3 - Tim O'Neil

CRC-Défi Ste-Agathe
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Dodge SRT4 - Raphaël Guité
Dodge Conquest - Conor Malone
Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart - Zbigniew Szewczyk

CRC-Tall Pines
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey
BMW 2002 - Richard Szmidt

2009
CRC -Perce Neige
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

OPRC-Lanark Highlands
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey

OPRC-Black Bear
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

RA -New England Forest Rally
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Mazda Speed3 - Wyatt Knox
Saab 99 - Luke Sorensen
Mazda 323 - Tom Barton
VW Rabbit TDi - Justin Carven
Acura Integra - Matt Johnston
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey

OPRC-Galway-Cavendish
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

CRC -Tall Pines
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf TDi - Michael Hordijk
Volvo 244 - Dave Marzetti

2010
OPRC-Lanark Highlands
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Dodge SRT4 - Thierry Menegoz

OPRC-Black Bear
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

RA -New England Forest Rally
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Mazda 3 - Lucy Block
Ford Fiesta - Dillon Van Way
Dodge SRT4 - Lauchlin O'Sullivan
Ford Focus - Michael Reilly
Mazda 323 - Tom Barton
Mazda Speed3 - Eric Burmeister
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey

CRC -Tall Pines
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf - Glen Clarke

2011
OPRC-Lanark Highlands
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey
VW Rabbit TDi - Justin Carven

VW Golf - Lance Webb

OPRC-Black Bear
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf - Lance Webb

RA -New England Forest Rally
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
Ford Focus - Michael Reilly
Saab 99 - Luke Sorensen
Dodge SRT4 - Doug Shepherd
Merkur XR4Ti - Tim Chevalier
VW Rabbit TDi - Justin Carven
Mazda Speed3 - Wyatt Knox
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey
Scion xD - Andrew Comrie-Picard
Geo Metro - Phillip McGee
Ford Fiesta - Dillon Van Way

CRC -Tall Pines
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf - Lance Webb
Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey
Ford Fiesta - Dillon Van Way

Mitsubishi Lancer - Jan Zedril

2012
CRC -Perce Neige
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter

OPRC-Lanark Highlands
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf - Lance Webb
VW Golf - Patrick Rainville

OPRC-Black Bear
Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter
VW Golf - Patrick Rainville

OPRC-Galway-Cavendish
VW Golf - Lance Webb
VW Golf - Jeannie MacGillivray
Dodge Conquest - Conor Malone

I reiterate, that list of Gr5 cars is just from the events of which I have personal knowledge. Yes Gr5 has been under-represented at many events. But it's a stretch to pretend that there have never been 3 or more at any event.

Until we go to Black River Stages next week, our only experience so far with US rallies has been at the New England Forest Rally. Gr5 is certainly far more popular in the U.S., and some American Gr5 competitors have made forays into Canadian events.

The sudden new CARS regulation is unlikely to encourage greater participation from our American Gr5 friends, and a 32mm restrictor is not going to improve our chances when competing at NEFR with the Nissan.

Trautie, Trautie was villst du mit dieser scheiss-pratt??
What do you you will accomplish clogging up this discussion with facts and reality.
Let me ask you directly, we must establish important things:

Have you talked to one tuner?

(harumph!) Well there you have it. (snorf!)

Your antagonist wasn't wrong, he was just using hyperbole.
That's how you have reasonable dialog, use hyperbole.
Say anything you want, then when it is shown it was absurdity, you clarify that you were using hyperbole.

With this new view, you can see you can never be wrong, even retroactively.



John Vanlandingham
Sleezattle, WA, USA

Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

www.rallyrace.net/jvab
CALL +1 206 431-9696
Remember! Pacific Standard Time
is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/11/2012 03:58PM by john vanlandingham.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
heymagic
Banned
Senior Moderator
Location: La la land
Join Date: 01/25/2006
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 3,740

Rally Car:
Not a Volvo


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 03:57PM
Quote
Morison
One of the strange things happeing in this discussion is that people are saying that Gr5 cars are being restricted because the open class cars were going too fast and that it doesn't make any sense.
The thing is ... no one from CARS, or the class change committee, ever said Gr5 was being restricted because they are too fast in a global sense or that 'they' wanted to keep them slower than the open cars.

I've said before, but will reiterate, that the restrictor on Gr5 cars exists to work at leveling the playing field between Gr5 and Gr2 cars. By combining the classes, 2/3 of the competitors in the class are saddled with 'underdog' cars and are even more of an underdog without the resirictors. The argument that a well driven Gr2 car can beat a poorly driven Gr5 car doesn't fly. Competitive drivers will always make sure their cars are built to the class they are in and will maximise what they can do within their budgets. If the classes were merged without restrictions, Gr2 drivers would have to make major changes if they wanted to bring a gun to a gun fight.



Maybe we having trouble with the translation from Canadian to American here..
This is copied from Adams post a couple pages back :

The problem of meeting a mandatory maximum average speed and keeping compeition within classes close so as to not only prevent overdog cars, but to also entice manufacturers into a series where they won't be hampered by running their new cars. Chicanes have a number of issues to them that have been discussed ad nauseum. You either A) slow the road down/new roads or cool smiley have slower cars. The other issues, again, this has been made at a national level, they have different priorities than the regions do.

2wd is not enough of a restriction, or else we wouldn't be having this conversation. I just provided you with an example at a regional where a driver (who is decent) took a turbo 2.0L car to the maximum average speed on ice/snow/mud/gravel which had 3 or 4 big chicanes on the stage. So something has to be done. This (along with a whole bunch of other issues) is how it has been decided to be resolved. I am almost quite certain that a 2wd car with 300whp throws rocks just as hard as a car with 500whp (in a sense) so I fail to see your reasoning. The car will still sound gnarly, make lots of noise, and throw rocks sideways in a stupendous fashion.

Certainly points to speed here. You (CARS) are (pardon the crudeness) fucking with the very fabric that rally was made from...2wd open cars. Most everyone on here in the last 40 years started and competed with 2wd Open. There has never been a large issue with speeds nor competition. Lane is a hero to both competitors and spectators, Holmes is a hero, Utecht is a hero, Lurch the same and many others with big power 2wd cars. None of them are hated by the G2 guys nor feared. Burrus ain't askeerd, Havas neither, nor Cody Crane. So I have to call bullshit on the reasoning,,any of the changing excuses. You want to attract manufactures in even competition in P class, have at it, leave 2wd Open alone. Not enough G5 cars for a seperate class then lump the classes together. As it stands now CARS is killing the G5, not merging. You add both a size restriction and a turbo restrictor. That is like shooting someone in the head three times and then using an axe to connect the dots. You don't get 300hp out of a restricted 2.0 car without spending a large fortune btw. Low to middle 200 about it. And further more a 2.3 pinto can easily exceed 250-300 in NA trim with a smaller checkbook and see nice rpms to make it fun, but that requires a complete rebuild from a turbo setup, expensive still. Underdog or overdog (goofy thought process) is still the purchasers choice.

There is nothing awe inspiring about a 2.3 Volvo turbo, nor a Merkur. Many older cars are cheap to build and own, and nearly impossible to tune to a 32mm restrictor. Very expensive if you have to get a programable engine management, a turbo machined (new turbo also, cuz the old one is too big to start with) for the restrictor and then get it tuned. Now the car won't exceed past 6K, makes no power, is harder to drive, trans is geared wrong and reliability gone. very expensive proposition in the end.

It is not the job of a sanctioning body to decide which brand of car is 'fair'. Every sonuvabbitch who bought a RX intended to take advantage over the 2wd cars, GTX smashed those, Talons took advantage over the GTX, WRX over the Talon, Sti and Evo over the WRX, none of those cars were purchased for a fair fight. They were bought to either keep up or defeat someone. And thru it all the lowly 2wd guys held their own, suffered the constant drop down the overall board and enjoyed some of the best competition and comradery in the sport.

This is similar judgement to Prince Harry in Vegas, might seem ok at the time but doesn't look so good from the outside world...

I guess I'm too thick to get it, sorry. I think CARS needs to get 3 red Xs and sent off the stage....
Please Login or Register to post a reply
john vanlandingham
John Vanlandingham
Elite Moderator
Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA
Join Date: 12/20/2005
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 14,152

Rally Car:
Saab 96 V4



Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 04:13PM
Quote
Do It Sidewayz
I still think the best comparison between Grp 2 and Grp 5 you could make would be Chris Duplessis and Will Orders.

Chris - As "prepped" of a Group 2 car we have....great suspension, good gearbox and final drive and diff, great brakes, but maybe giving up some power.

But with a relatively light car, a motor that will rev and the final drive turns that revs into torque.

Quote

Will - As "prepped" of a Group 5 car we have....good suspension, great gearbox, good brakes, and piles of power...most importantly no restrictor
.

A relatively heavier car, and even with no restrictor probably not revving much past 7 ever, maybe a "OK" box and maybe 4.27 final drive.


Quote

These guys have run 2 events, and come within seconds of each other.

Both obviously great drivers, pushing their cars.

2wd does a great job of equalizing the playing field itself.

Waht we've come to call round these parts "the beauty of 2wd"

Quote

The light/nimble group 2 cars, can put their modest power down, do great in the tight stuff, but run out of legs on more open roads.

Maybe, but even with short gearing around (total box x diff) 5 :1 they'll still do 170 km/hr @ 7000

Quote

The generally heavier and bigger group 5 cars, struggle to put the big power down which hurts in the tight stuff,

Only those who got motor fixated---which is the unfortunate fate of too many..

Quote

but love the more open roads.

If they got a stable car.

Quote

Put a 32mm on Will and he's going to cry...he'll still make big torque and spin the tires in the slow stuff, but where he used to make up time the motor will be struggling for air.

This has also been proved in MaxAttack in years past.

That IS the point, isn't it obvious?

Quote

Allowing the bigger motors and scrapping the restrictor for Open 2wd will not hurt the competition...imho it will make it better. There was nothing wrong with taking the existing Group 2 and Group 5 class and saying "boy and girls, you are all fighting for the same hardware now, have at it"...pretty sure everyone would have just said "damn right, lets go!"

Yep.

Should be pretty obvious.
Shoul be...eye rolling smiley



John Vanlandingham
Sleezattle, WA, USA

Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

www.rallyrace.net/jvab
CALL +1 206 431-9696
Remember! Pacific Standard Time
is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Morison
Banned
Godlike Moderator
Location: Calgary, AB
Join Date: 03/27/2009
Age: Ancient
Posts: 1,798

Rally Car:
(ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought)


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 04:29PM
Quote
john vanlandingham
Have you talked to one tuner?
You seem obsessed by the term tuner.
Maybe to clarify, the committee talked to several respected rally car builders and engine builders each with significant and respected competition and preparation experience.

Quote
john vanlandingham
Say anything you want, then when it is shown it was absurdity, you clarify that you were using hyperbole.
Maybe you missed it - I admitted my assessment was wrong. I'm always willing to accept when I am wrong.



First Rally: 2001
Driver (7), Co-Driver (44)
Drivers (16)
Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4)
Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0)
Last Updated, January 4, 2015



Quote
john vanlandingham
Blame is for idiots. losers.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
HiTempguy
Banned
Mega Moderator
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Join Date: 09/13/2011
Posts: 717

Rally Car:
2002 Subaru WRX STi


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 04:40PM
Quote
heymagic

Maybe we having trouble with the translation from Canadian to American here..
This is copied from Adams post a couple pages back :

I am not CARS. I attend any meetings I possibly can, and bug individuals such as Keith and Eric relentlessly to get information. I have a responsibility to members of RallyWest to be informed about everything. Sometimes I disagree with the way Keith explains things. This you will notice in my posts.

I use this, formulate an opinion, and present it. Some of it is based directly on what CARS has said at discussions (the agm, where I sat in on the organizers main meeting and then moved onto the competitors meeting). But I'm not CARS.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
john vanlandingham
John Vanlandingham
Elite Moderator
Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA
Join Date: 12/20/2005
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 14,152

Rally Car:
Saab 96 V4



Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 04:57PM
Quote
Morison
Quote
john vanlandingham
Have you talked to one tuner?
You seem obsessed by the term tuner.
Maybe to clarify, the committee talked to several respected rally car builders and engine builders each with significant and respected competition and preparation experience.

Quote
john vanlandingham
Say anything you want, then when it is shown it was absurdity, you clarify that you were using hyperbole.
Maybe you missed it - I admitted my assessment was wrong. I'm always willing to accept when I am wrong.

"Several respected rally car builders and engine builders each with significant and respected competition and preparation experience. "

OOooooooooohhhhH... clarify.. I thought they said they talked with toonerz..

Gee, I wonder just what those respected rally car builders and engine builders each with significant and respected competition and preparation experience work on?
See allusions may work to mollify some, but some might ask if those respected rally car builders and engine builders each with significant and respected competition and preparation experience worked with the typical broke ass dreamer beginners who have extremely limited budget, and experience, you know, like most people who are not independently wealthy.

Because you must admit that it is fairly evident that somebody gave no thought to what restrictors on Group5 cars will cost and how that will slow down Open class cars..



John Vanlandingham
Sleezattle, WA, USA

Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

www.rallyrace.net/jvab
CALL +1 206 431-9696
Remember! Pacific Standard Time
is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Morison
Banned
Godlike Moderator
Location: Calgary, AB
Join Date: 03/27/2009
Age: Ancient
Posts: 1,798

Rally Car:
(ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought)


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 05:00PM
Quote
Ferdinand
That has nothing to do with the Gr5 vs Gr2 issue, but is more a consequence of trying to manage a National championship in a country the size of Canada. How many of us can afford to do 7,000 km of towing?
Except that over 17 years of the Group 2 championship there has always been a winner, it has never gone unawarded. Also, from an ottawa base, you can qualify for the Canadian Championship while towing a TOTAL of 1100km.
Quote
Ferdinand
... and how many Gr2 in 2012? Was there a proportional drop in Gr2 as well?
2012 to date Gr2: 4,4,6,4 starts, 2,4,4,1 finishes - 18 entries over 12 unique drivers and two events left.
YTD change over last year: raw numbers(percentage of 2011 entries):
Gr2: 0,+2(200%),-1(86%),+1(133%)
Gr5: -1(50%),0,-1(0%),-1(0%)

Quote
Ferdinand
We're not yet "suitably pissed off". I don't even know yet what Martin's reaction to this is.
But the cross border issue is still a concern for you and I urge you to make that known to CARS. If you think a groundswell of support on any web forum will be heard by CARS, you're wrong.

Quote
Ferdinand
Forget trying to build anything to the Production Class rules. Way too picky and restrictive.
Although the 'new' production rules are far less restrictive... but that's another can of worms.

Quote
Ferdinand
In fact, all the Gr5 cars are also already getting whupped by those fastest Gr2 cars.
But we're back to talking about classing the drivers, not the cars.



First Rally: 2001
Driver (7), Co-Driver (44)
Drivers (16)
Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4)
Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0)
Last Updated, January 4, 2015



Quote
john vanlandingham
Blame is for idiots. losers.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Morison
Banned
Godlike Moderator
Location: Calgary, AB
Join Date: 03/27/2009
Age: Ancient
Posts: 1,798

Rally Car:
(ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought)


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 05:20PM
Quote
john vanlandingham
Gee, I wonder just what those respected rally car builders and engine builders each with significant and respected competition and preparation experience work on?
Um... rally cars and engines. (duh)
In all seriousness the names of the shops don't really matter. They are, in the eyes of the committee, reputable and informed sources. I can assure you cost was a part of the discussion.
Quote
john vanlandingham
Because you must admit that it is fairly evident that somebody gave no thought to what restrictors on Group5 cars will cost...
Being that I was involved in discussions about the cost of restrictors to G5 cars I can assure you there was thought given to it.
Quote
john vanlandingham
...and how that will slow down Open class cars.
Restrictiors in Gr5 did not come about from the concerns about the average speeds being maxed out.



First Rally: 2001
Driver (7), Co-Driver (44)
Drivers (16)
Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4)
Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0)
Last Updated, January 4, 2015



Quote
john vanlandingham
Blame is for idiots. losers.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
hoche
Michel Hoche-Mong
Godlike Moderator
Location: Campbell, CA
Join Date: 02/28/2006
Age: Possibly Wise
Posts: 1,156

Rally Car:
Golf, Golf, RX-3



Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 11, 2012 05:43PM
Blah, blah, blah.

Rather than all this nonsense about cars, how about we talk about ways to make the roads twistier?



Self-righteous douche canoe
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login