Rally Chat
Don\
john vanlandingham
John Vanlandingham
Elite Moderator
Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA
Join Date: 12/20/2005
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 14,152

Rally Car:
Saab 96 V4



Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 04:39PM
Morison we are all deluded about motorsport and any honest person knows this.. You being a part time amateur and concerned with perceived status want to maintain some facade propriety...
And of course being in Marketing, well we know about "marketing"...eye rolling smiley

People that do this who are well adjusted know WE are all crazy when we spend time helping with work, advice, volunteering.
I'm volunteering at Olympus and will be at Mt Hood too.
aren't i special?
No I'm a loon just like most.

Don't pretend you are so stupid that you do not understand the usage...

Wait, that's right. you may be that...no no no.



John Vanlandingham
Sleezattle, WA, USA

Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

www.rallyrace.net/jvab
CALL +1 206 431-9696
Remember! Pacific Standard Time
is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Morison
Banned
Mod Moderator
Location: Calgary, AB
Join Date: 03/27/2009
Age: Ancient
Posts: 1,798

Rally Car:
(ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought)


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 05:30PM
Fuckin' pointless. You're in your own little world John.
You're infallible.
You're always right.
You know what is best for everyone in every way.
You're a master fabricator who always turns out brilliant work and has nothing but the happiest of customers
Anyone who questions what you say is an idiot
Anyone who comes to different conclusions than you is an idiot

The most impressive thing is you know how to decode what I write and sort out what I really mean - much of which is a surprise to me. (Even though we've never met and you know fuck all about who I am or what motivates me.)

The sad thing is that you generally have some very good and well thought out ideas/points that are generally lost to the noise you surround them in. What could be a good conversation - or even a valuable lecture - is often discounted as the ramblings of a madman. (I know of someone who was convinced you were an online alter ego that was intended as a joke and didn't really exist!)

We live in very different worlds John.



First Rally: 2001
Driver (7), Co-Driver (44)
Drivers (16)
Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4)
Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0)
Last Updated, January 4, 2015



Quote
john vanlandingham
Blame is for idiots. losers.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Anders Green
Anders Green
Godlike Moderator
Location: Raleigh, NC
Join Date: 03/30/2006
Age: Possibly Wise
Posts: 1,478

Rally Car:
Parked



Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 06:16PM
Quote
KTurner
See Verena Mei BS-spec RA championship. no results on the website and pretty sure there was no competition.

Quote
BillyElliot
Yet, somehow it was won by Verena when they were the only ones showing up to every event.

Wait, what? I looked on the standings page ( http://rally-america.com/champ_standings.php ) and this championship isn't there. And Verena is listed in 2WD in the event results I looked at. I thought that was a championship for next year. Are there any results for it anywhere? How do you win a championship that isn't scored? Who's in second?

That's my quota of confusion for the weekend. confused smiley

Anders



Grassroots rally. It's what I think about.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
john vanlandingham
John Vanlandingham
Elite Moderator
Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA
Join Date: 12/20/2005
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 14,152

Rally Car:
Saab 96 V4



Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 06:27PM
Quote
Morison
Fuckin' pointless. You're in your own little world John.
You're infallible.
You're always right.
You know what is best for everyone in every way.
You're a master fabricator who always turns out brilliant work and has nothing but the happiest of customers
Anyone who questions what you say is an idiot
Anyone who comes to different conclusions than you is an idiot

The most impressive thing is you know how to decode what I write and sort out what I really mean - much of which is a surprise to me. (Even though we've never met and you know fuck all about who I am or what motivates me.)

The sad thing is that you generally have some very good and well thought out ideas/points that are generally lost to the noise you surround them in. What could be a good conversation - or even a valuable lecture - is often discounted as the ramblings of a madman. (I know of someone who was convinced you were an online alter ego that was intended as a joke and didn't really exist!)

We live in very different worlds John.

Respond to what was posed.
many people say a lot of nonsense without realising it.
It's the human condition. Talk to anybody who has been in a relationship they care for, marriage, kids or something and we all say things we did mean to offend with or were thoughtless.

MOST people don't think about either logic of language. Most people---like you---think the other person needs to study it.

Yes we live in different worlds.
Thank god.



Yeah know what I'm saying? Just look: you do like the above example and lecture on the commonplace to people. Are you so un-selfreflective that you don't understand that when you lecture and explain ordinary things, the "meta-message" is that YOU KNOW what and you are going to explain---what everybody already knows.

IF I often have well thought out and logic coherant information about these little things we're playing with in some areas I've done a long time, then it does seem to follow that in other areas, the opinions would be equally well thought out and, like the mechanical advice, build advice, based on years of experience.

Maybe you've never thought about how your words are taken, since you seem to be convinced of your rectitude, and how you dismiss anything you haven't thought up or experienced.

I am curious , that's all, if you made even a seconds worth of effort to consider what I wrote about what the kernal of annoyance with your written style. Did you?

You can repeat the stupid shit about 'anybody who doesn't agree with you is an idiot. but that is and always has been a filthy, lame lie.
Currently, between these posts I am working on things for a rabbit, a Suzuki, a couple of Volvos,. a couple of Xratties, a couple of Subies, a BMW, an AE86, a Golf, an RX7 and I could waste more time listing the BIG VARIETY of other cars I've done in just the last year---(Nissan fwd, Nissan RWD, old Subies from the 80s, and they are HAPPY to talk not just about their suspension but other prep, driving, life, families, all kinds of things with a huge range of things that simply are, no I'm right, they wrong)
You have talked to none of these guys, I have, and none of them feels I'm talking to them like they're idiots because they don't agree.
They all seem to be laughing it up and having a good time, the different choice of car doesn't enter into it..

THAT repetition is the second reason I think you're an immoral, and basically dishonest person and hold you in the extreme contempt I do..
I usually have contempt for liars.
Most people do.

So go read, respond to what I've posed to you as questions, stop lying and repeating lies.

Treat others with respect consistently and maybe after a while, if we see you have reformed yourself, you might get some respect back.

(It may take thinking a little what you say, and what the words you say can mean. of course that means there must be some self-doubt, doubt that whatever you say might not be right)

And come on Morison, history is full of examples of ordinary, common people dismissing things they cannot conceive of as the ravings of madmen.



John Vanlandingham
Sleezattle, WA, USA

Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

www.rallyrace.net/jvab
CALL +1 206 431-9696
Remember! Pacific Standard Time
is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/09/2012 06:50PM by john vanlandingham.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
BillyElliot
Billy Elliot Mann
Senior Moderator
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Join Date: 08/11/2008
Age: Midlife Crisis
Posts: 557

Rally Car:
1996 Honda Civic with VTEC YO!


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 06:53PM
Quote
Anders Green
Quote
KTurner
See Verena Mei BS-spec RA championship. no results on the website and pretty sure there was no competition.

Quote
BillyElliot
Yet, somehow it was won by Verena when they were the only ones showing up to every event.

Wait, what? I looked on the standings page ( http://rally-america.com/champ_standings.php ) and this championship isn't there. And Verena is listed in 2WD in the event results I looked at. I thought that was a championship for next year. Are there any results for it anywhere? How do you win a championship that isn't scored? Who's in second?

That's my quota of confusion for the weekend. confused smiley

Anders

That's why the press release surprised me. I know for her results she was never really comparing to the other 2WD and only looking at the P class cars.

In her press release for winning the championship, it states Robinson and Guitar were 2nd and 3rd. But they both work for Honda and drive the same P class Fit. I only know of one other car that would maybe be considered B-spec and that was the Broken Motorsports Fiesta, which was still not running a restrictor as far as I know.

I know NEFR had something about a b-spec cash prize, but I never saw anything come out of that either.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 09/09/2012 06:55PM by BillyElliot.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
tipo158
Alan Perry
Infallible Moderator
Location: Bainbridge Island, WA
Join Date: 02/20/2008
Age: Ancient
Posts: 430


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 08:02PM
Quote
john vanlandingham
Quote
tipo158
I think that it is pretty funny that a bunch of guys who have never even competed in Canada would have such strong opinions about what the Canadians should do.

alan

So, Alan WRONG as usual.
Yeah real funny.

So, because you have (as a co-driver, not someone who runs his own car and would be impacted by these changes), all of the other guys from the US commenting in this have? How does that work?

Oh, sorry. I am wrong as usual and all of those other guys have as well.

Once I see the light, John, do I have to start calling Keith names as well? Sorry, Keith. I just can't go against the wisdom of John.

alan
Please Login or Register to post a reply
NoCoast
Grant Hughes
Senior Moderator
Location: Whitefish, MT
Join Date: 01/11/2006
Age: Midlife Crisis
Posts: 6,818

Rally Car:
BMW



Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 08:29PM
Sorry Adam. Not directed at you, was rushing to finish post so I could change the baby's diaper and get changed for soccer.
I haven't read half the posts. Once I see John and Keith start posting alot I stop reading most of the posts in a thread and start quick scanning and reading just snippets.
Yeah, US rally championship is currently dominated in Open/Overall by foreigners. The fast US guys are all too capitalist and have either left to chase money or left to stop hemmoraging money.. Tanner, Block, Pastrana, MJ, Stephan, Iorio are a few that come to mind. There are some supremely talented drivers that will never be able to afford an opportunity to do anything and that's okay cause that's the nature of motorsport. I don't think any North American sanctioning body is approaching rally in a smart way. Wasn't aimed at anyone or anything in particular. smiling smiley



Grant Hughes
Please Login or Register to post a reply
fliz
Chad Eixenberger
Infallible Moderator
Location: Grafton, WI
Join Date: 02/01/2007
Age: Midlife Crisis
Posts: 484

Rally Car:
1988 VW Golf #687


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 08:59PM
Quote
BillyElliot
Quote
Anders Green
Quote
KTurner
See Verena Mei BS-spec RA championship. no results on the website and pretty sure there was no competition.

Quote
BillyElliot
Yet, somehow it was won by Verena when they were the only ones showing up to every event.

Wait, what? I looked on the standings page ( http://rally-america.com/champ_standings.php ) and this championship isn't there. And Verena is listed in 2WD in the event results I looked at. I thought that was a championship for next year. Are there any results for it anywhere? How do you win a championship that isn't scored? Who's in second?

That's my quota of confusion for the weekend. confused smiley

Anders

That's why the press release surprised me. I know for her results she was never really comparing to the other 2WD and only looking at the P class cars.

In her press release for winning the championship, it states Robinson and Guitar were 2nd and 3rd. But they both work for Honda and drive the same P class Fit. I only know of one other car that would maybe be considered B-spec and that was the Broken Motorsports Fiesta, which was still not running a restrictor as far as I know.

I know NEFR had something about a b-spec cash prize, but I never saw anything come out of that either.

RA made their own B-spec series, and announced it in a rules bulletin. Pretty much any new P class car:

http://rally-america.com/RuleBulletin/Rule_Bulletin_2012_006.pdf
Please Login or Register to post a reply
heymagic
Banned
Godlike Moderator
Location: La la land
Join Date: 01/25/2006
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 3,740

Rally Car:
Not a Volvo


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 09:41PM
Quote
HiTempguy
Quote
JohnLane
Quote
HiTempguy
I see these rules as a rallyings equivalent of social engineering.

Solving exactly what problem?

'Social Engineering?' Little different ring to it but you're still saying that thou shalt use a certain flavor of car. A Boring car. A car that will be slow; in particular with a restrictor making the poor thing wheeze as though it has asthma. People are excited to hear my powerful car coming and have rocks thrown at them. IMHO this seems like a better direction to go. Two drive wheels are already enough of a restriction for how fast one can go and how many drivers can really drive one to it's potential? We all know that we're not hero's.

The problem of meeting a mandatory maximum average speed and keeping compeition within classes close so as to not only prevent overdog cars, but to also entice manufacturers into a series where they won't be hampered by running their new cars. Chicanes have a number of issues to them that have been discussed ad nauseum. You either A) slow the road down/new roads or cool smiley have slower cars. The other issues, again, this has been made at a national level, they have different priorities than the regions do.

2wd is not enough of a restriction, or else we wouldn't be having this conversation. I just provided you with an example at a regional where a driver (who is decent) took a turbo 2.0L car to the maximum average speed on ice/snow/mud/gravel which had 3 or 4 big chicanes on the stage. So something has to be done. This (along with a whole bunch of other issues) is how it has been decided to be resolved. I am almost quite certain that a 2wd car with 300whp throws rocks just as hard as a car with 500whp (in a sense) so I fail to see your reasoning. The car will still sound gnarly, make lots of noise, and throw rocks sideways in a stupendous fashion.

Understand, I am not arguing CARS point for them, as I disagree with some of it as well. But that is the rationale (from what I understand) behind the decisions.

I missed the exact example of the 2wd driver mentioned, wouldn't mind if you repeated it. So it sounds like one 2wd car caused a dull axe to be used on the rest of the class. Yet the real problem, Open AWD goes relatively unscathed, seems odd and a bit unbalanced.

So while someone mentioned somewhere that a car could be raced with a 32 mm restrictor without tuning that isn't realistic. The sr20det example left Japan with a 42mm restrictor I believe. Roughly a 30% reduction in inlet size, large power loss, someone will tune and then everyone will have to. The rest of the potential competitors affected will need different cars or motor swaps due to the size limits. Quite a large expense for those who possibly can least afford it.

I see the need for speed reduction but it should be started at the top (the real problem) and then done in a downward fashion. I don't believe the slow cars need to be slowed . Slow the very fast and if they are then beat by the next tier (who isn't going any faster than before) oh well. You now have even closer competiton and that seems what most competitors want.

If someone has a brain tumor, a skilled surgeon removes it with a scalpel...and not with a guillotine.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
HiTempguy
Banned
Mega Moderator
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Join Date: 09/13/2011
Posts: 717

Rally Car:
2002 Subaru WRX STi


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 11:37PM
Quote
heymagic

I missed the exact example of the 2wd driver mentioned, wouldn't mind if you repeated it. So it sounds like one 2wd car caused a dull axe to be used on the rest of the class. Yet the real problem, Open AWD goes relatively unscathed, seems odd and a bit unbalanced.

Krystian Ostrowski, but it's irrelevant. I was simply using him as an example of how a way overpowered (4G63T talon 2wd) car can run as fast as the open 4wd guys if the stages are too fast. On high speed stages, a 300+ whp 2wd car can REALLY stretch it's legs. 4wd cars get choked off by their gearing and 34mm restrictors (160-180km/h) but if I had twice the power my Talon had AND top end... easily would have hit 200+km/h on ice/snow/mud at Cochrane.

As for open awd... yea... hmm. I'll take a no comment pass on that.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
BillyElliot
Billy Elliot Mann
Senior Moderator
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Join Date: 08/11/2008
Age: Midlife Crisis
Posts: 557

Rally Car:
1996 Honda Civic with VTEC YO!


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 11:39PM
Quote
fliz
Quote
BillyElliot
Quote
Anders Green
Quote
KTurner
See Verena Mei BS-spec RA championship. no results on the website and pretty sure there was no competition.

Quote
BillyElliot
Yet, somehow it was won by Verena when they were the only ones showing up to every event.

Wait, what? I looked on the standings page ( http://rally-america.com/champ_standings.php ) and this championship isn't there. And Verena is listed in 2WD in the event results I looked at. I thought that was a championship for next year. Are there any results for it anywhere? How do you win a championship that isn't scored? Who's in second?

That's my quota of confusion for the weekend. confused smiley

Anders

That's why the press release surprised me. I know for her results she was never really comparing to the other 2WD and only looking at the P class cars.

In her press release for winning the championship, it states Robinson and Guitar were 2nd and 3rd. But they both work for Honda and drive the same P class Fit. I only know of one other car that would maybe be considered B-spec and that was the Broken Motorsports Fiesta, which was still not running a restrictor as far as I know.

I know NEFR had something about a b-spec cash prize, but I never saw anything come out of that either.

RA made their own B-spec series, and announced it in a rules bulletin. Pretty much any new P class car:

http://rally-america.com/RuleBulletin/Rule_Bulletin_2012_006.pdf

So I guess I read that bulletin wrong. You simply need to enter a P class car from that list... period. So you can do things outside of the offical B-Spec rules, like stitch weld chassis, plate shock towers, add a LSD, run adjustable dampers can run to the P class weight limits and do not need a restrictor if the rules call for it?

Maybe Alan can help me out on this one?
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Morison
Banned
Mod Moderator
Location: Calgary, AB
Join Date: 03/27/2009
Age: Ancient
Posts: 1,798

Rally Car:
(ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought)


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 11:40PM
Quote
john vanlandingham
You can repeat the stupid shit about 'anybody who doesn't agree with you is an idiot. but that is and always has been a filthy, lame lie.
There is a difference between hyperbole and a lie, John.
Since the difference is obvious and commonly recognizable I wouldn't have thought you'd need that pointed out.

Quote
john vanlandingham
Are you so un-selfreflective that you don't understand that when you lecture and explain ordinary things, the "meta-message" is that YOU KNOW what and you are going to explain---what everybody already knows.
Perhaps I'm just not arrogant enough to think that my commenting on something or my saying something would be taken as anything more than what it is. A discussion point. I'm not lecturing and I don't know why you continue to take it that way - you're one of the few who do.

Quote
john vanlandingham
IF I often have well thought out and logic coherant information about these little things we're playing with in some areas I've done a long time, then it does seem to follow that in other areas, the opinions would be equally well thought out and, like the mechanical advice, build advice, based on years of experience.
Agreed. But what's your point?
I was merely saying that your good advice is too often wrapped up in garbage that makes many people I know not bother to dig for it.

Quote
john vanlandingham
...since you seem to be convinced of your rectitude, and how you dismiss anything you haven't thought up or experienced.
Again, you show that you don't know me at all. Maybe you have me on rectitude, but don't most people think of themselves as just, moral and honorable?
As for dismissing anything I haven't thought up or experienced... you're flat wrong about that. I tend to not blindly accept things and I'll quickly question things but I wouldn't call either of those 'dismissing' things.

Quote
john vanlandingham
Maybe you've never thought about how your words are taken... I am curious , that's all, if you made even a seconds worth of effort to consider what I wrote about what the kernal of annoyance with your written style. Did you?
,
Not really. Since you're really the only one who's expressed annoyance with my written style and since you've admitted that you read between the lines to find the hidden messages... what's the point.
What I find humerous is that most of what you complain about my doing in my writing are things that come straight out of your playbook.

Quote
john vanlandingham
Currently, between these posts I am working on things for a rabbit, a Suzuki, a couple of Volvos,. a couple of Xratties, a couple of Subies, a BMW, an AE86, a Golf, an RX7 and I could waste more time listing the BIG VARIETY of other cars I've done in just the last year... none of them feels I'm talking to them like they're idiots because they don't agree.
I've never suggested, or thought, you were stupid enough to tell paying customers that you thought they were idiots.


Quote
john vanlandingham
(It may take thinking a little what you say, and what the words you say can mean. of course that means there must be some self-doubt, doubt that whatever you say might not be right)
Are you sure about that John? (C'mon, you gotta laugh at that one!)
In all seriousness I think that the difference is that I know, and I expect others to understand, that whatever I say is coming from my experience and my knowledge to that point. I expect, and encourage, people to challenge what I say and bring their knowledge and experience into the conversation.
As an example, I probably told Adam that buying and running a Talon was a poor idea if he wanted something sustainable and competitive. Knowing what I know now, I wouldn't say that again and I've adjusted how I look at these things.

Quote
john vanlandingham
And come on Morison, history is full of examples of ordinary, common people dismissing things they cannot conceive of as the ravings of madmen.
Oh the arrogance.
I never said people couldn't conceive what you were saying. All I was saying is that you tend to rave on so much that people (most who I talk to) start discounting what you say on a wholesale level. That's really unfortunate because I have, and always will, said that you are a good source of information and knowledge.



First Rally: 2001
Driver (7), Co-Driver (44)
Drivers (16)
Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4)
Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0)
Last Updated, January 4, 2015



Quote
john vanlandingham
Blame is for idiots. losers.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
frumby
Jason Hynd
Mega Moderator
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Join Date: 03/16/2007
Age: Possibly Wise
Posts: 333

Rally Car:
XR4TI a slow build!



Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 11:48PM
I have competed in Canada, and would gladly do so again (after car is finished, and after I get back from three years in Hi). I think these rules suck. I left Open AWD so I didn't have to mess with a restrictor. Fans want to see powerful cars. We want to drive them. This will force us to waste a lot of money trying to get there, where as now we can turn up the boost a bit and be happy with 250hp. A modern 2.0 turbo will be stronger than an old 2.3 turbo Ford so the displacement rule also sucks. Truth is, it's not 'our' series, and we can go elsewhere. It's just a shame.
If we're trying to attract 'factory' cars, then let them build bad ass cars and come race! No reason to spoil our fun. Ford should be able to figure out how to make a fiesta faster than Toms old Rabbit, or my Merkur when it eventually gets finished.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Morison
Banned
Mod Moderator
Location: Calgary, AB
Join Date: 03/27/2009
Age: Ancient
Posts: 1,798

Rally Car:
(ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought)


Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 09, 2012 11:53PM
Quote
heymagic
I see the need for speed reduction but it should be started at the top (the real problem) and then done in a downward fashion. I don't believe the slow cars need to be slowed.
The basic measure we use for 'safe' speeds, average speed, is flawed. But, without the safety profile you can get with Jemba it is the only objective measure we can use.

My experience is that on the fast open roads a PGT car will actually hit a higher top speed than an open class car and, if Will Orders is any indication, a well done G5 car would probably be even faster.

What's worse is that chichanes used to slow down average speeds are almost universally in locations that do little to increase actual safety and, in some cases actually introduce hazards.
But the question becomes, if not average speed - how will you measure the safety or suitability of a stage?



First Rally: 2001
Driver (7), Co-Driver (44)
Drivers (16)
Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4)
Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0)
Last Updated, January 4, 2015



Quote
john vanlandingham
Blame is for idiots. losers.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
john vanlandingham
John Vanlandingham
Elite Moderator
Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA
Join Date: 12/20/2005
Age: Fossilized
Posts: 14,152

Rally Car:
Saab 96 V4



Re: Four Class Structure - CARS Bulletin 2012-05 now online
September 10, 2012 12:54AM
Quote
heymagic
Quote
HiTempguy
Quote
JohnLane
Quote
HiTempguy
I see these rules as a rallyings equivalent of social engineering.

Solving exactly what problem?

'Social Engineering?' Little different ring to it but you're still saying that thou shalt use a certain flavor of car. A Boring car. A car that will be slow; in particular with a restrictor making the poor thing wheeze as though it has asthma. People are excited to hear my powerful car coming and have rocks thrown at them. IMHO this seems like a better direction to go. Two drive wheels are already enough of a restriction for how fast one can go and how many drivers can really drive one to it's potential? We all know that we're not hero's.

The problem of meeting a mandatory maximum average speed and keeping compeition within classes close so as to not only prevent overdog cars, but to also entice manufacturers into a series where they won't be hampered by running their new cars. Chicanes have a number of issues to them that have been discussed ad nauseum. You either A) slow the road down/new roads or cool smiley have slower cars. The other issues, again, this has been made at a national level, they have different priorities than the regions do.

2wd is not enough of a restriction, or else we wouldn't be having this conversation. I just provided you with an example at a regional where a driver (who is decent) took a turbo 2.0L car to the maximum average speed on ice/snow/mud/gravel which had 3 or 4 big chicanes on the stage. So something has to be done. This (along with a whole bunch of other issues) is how it has been decided to be resolved. I am almost quite certain that a 2wd car with 300whp throws rocks just as hard as a car with 500whp (in a sense) so I fail to see your reasoning. The car will still sound gnarly, make lots of noise, and throw rocks sideways in a stupendous fashion.

Understand, I am not arguing CARS point for them, as I disagree with some of it as well. But that is the rationale (from what I understand) behind the decisions.

I missed the exact example of the 2wd driver mentioned, wouldn't mind if you repeated it. So it sounds like one 2wd car caused a dull axe to be used on the rest of the class. Yet the real problem, Open AWD goes relatively unscathed, seems odd and a bit unbalanced.

So while someone mentioned somewhere that a car could be raced with a 32 mm restrictor without tuning that isn't realistic. The sr20det example left Japan with a 42mm restrictor I believe. Roughly a 30% reduction in inlet size, large power loss, someone will tune and then everyone will have to. The rest of the potential competitors affected will need different cars or motor swaps due to the size limits. Quite a large expense for those who possibly can least afford it.

I see the need for speed reduction but it should be started at the top (the real problem) and then done in a downward fashion. I don't believe the slow cars need to be slowed . Slow the very fast and if they are then beat by the next tier (who isn't going any faster than before) oh well. You now have even closer competiton and that seems what most competitors want.

If someone has a brain tumor, a skilled surgeon removes it with a scalpel...and not with a guillotine.

that presumes the surgeon has a brain..

<object width="480" height="360"><param name="movie" value="

?version=3&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name



the area of a 32mm hole is approx 58% of the area of a 42mm hole.

but hey, who's counting?



John Vanlandingham
Sleezattle, WA, USA

Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

www.rallyrace.net/jvab
CALL +1 206 431-9696
Remember! Pacific Standard Time
is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time.
Please Login or Register to post a reply
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login