Ferdinand Ferdinand Trauttmansdorff Elite Moderator Location: Ottawa, ON Join Date: 12/08/2007 Age: Ancient Posts: 59 |
Ya know there's this new-fangled thing called the internet, which has all sorts of useful stuff in it. I'll list the Group5 cars competing at just the events to which I've been as co-driver. I'm not going to do the research for every Cdn National, or Regional, event starting all the way back from "ever". I'll leave that to you. I'm sure the CARS rules committee must already have done this, correct??? Try starting at: http://www.rallyscoring.com/ CRC = Canadian Rally Championship CRQ = Championnat de Rallye du Québec OPRC= Ontario Performance Rally Championship RA = Rally America Cdn/US cross-border entries are marked in RED. 2007 CRC-Tall Pines Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter BMW 2002 - Richard Szmidt 2008 CRC-Perce Neige Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter Pontiac Sunbird - Michael Lavoie CRQ-Rallye Sanair Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter CRC-Baie-des-Chaleurs Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter Dodge SRT4 - Raphaël Guité Dodge Conquest - Conor Malone Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart - Zbigniew Szewczyk Mazda Speed 3 - Tim O'Neil CRC-Défi Ste-Agathe Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter Dodge SRT4 - Raphaël Guité Dodge Conquest - Conor Malone Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart - Zbigniew Szewczyk CRC-Tall Pines Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey BMW 2002 - Richard Szmidt 2009 CRC -Perce Neige Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter OPRC-Lanark Highlands Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey OPRC-Black Bear Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter RA -New England Forest Rally Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter Mazda Speed3 - Wyatt Knox Saab 99 - Luke Sorensen Mazda 323 - Tom Barton VW Rabbit TDi - Justin Carven Acura Integra - Matt Johnston Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey OPRC-Galway-Cavendish Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter CRC -Tall Pines Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter VW Golf TDi - Michael Hordijk Volvo 244 - Dave Marzetti 2010 OPRC-Lanark Highlands Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter Dodge SRT4 - Thierry Menegoz OPRC-Black Bear Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter RA -New England Forest Rally Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter Mazda 3 - Lucy Block Ford Fiesta - Dillon Van Way Dodge SRT4 - Lauchlin O'Sullivan Ford Focus - Michael Reilly Mazda 323 - Tom Barton Mazda Speed3 - Eric Burmeister Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey CRC -Tall Pines Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter VW Golf - Glen Clarke 2011 OPRC-Lanark Highlands Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey VW Rabbit TDi - Justin Carven VW Golf - Lance Webb OPRC-Black Bear Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter VW Golf - Lance Webb RA -New England Forest Rally Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter Ford Focus - Michael Reilly Saab 99 - Luke Sorensen Dodge SRT4 - Doug Shepherd Merkur XR4Ti - Tim Chevalier VW Rabbit TDi - Justin Carven Mazda Speed3 - Wyatt Knox Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey Scion xD - Andrew Comrie-Picard Geo Metro - Phillip McGee Ford Fiesta - Dillon Van Way CRC -Tall Pines Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter VW Golf - Lance Webb Datsun 280Z - Greg Healey Ford Fiesta - Dillon Van Way Mitsubishi Lancer - Jan Zedril 2012 CRC -Perce Neige Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter OPRC-Lanark Highlands Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter VW Golf - Lance Webb VW Golf - Patrick Rainville OPRC-Black Bear Nissan 240SX - Martin Walter VW Golf - Patrick Rainville OPRC-Galway-Cavendish VW Golf - Lance Webb VW Golf - Jeannie MacGillivray Dodge Conquest - Conor Malone I reiterate, that list of Gr5 cars is just from the events of which I have personal knowledge. Yes Gr5 has been under-represented at many events. But it's a stretch to pretend that there have never been 3 or more at any event. Until we go to Black River Stages next week, our only experience so far with US rallies has been at the New England Forest Rally. Gr5 is certainly far more popular in the U.S., and some American Gr5 competitors have made forays into Canadian events. The sudden new CARS regulation is unlikely to encourage greater participation from our American Gr5 friends, and a 32mm restrictor is not going to improve our chances when competing at NEFR with the Nissan. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/11/2012 02:01PM by Ferdinand. |
Morison Banned Super Moderator Location: Calgary, AB Join Date: 03/27/2009 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,798 Rally Car: (ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought) |
Mainly because speed was one of several factors. If I left the impression that speed was a primary consideration then I either mis-spoke or wasn't clear. That said, even if it wasn't mentioned, it was a consideration the board, if not the committee. Yet in two of the six years Gr5 has been around there hasn't been enough entries to award the championship and it looks like 2012 will probably also go unawarded unless someone decides to do both PFR and Pines, which means 7,000 km of towing. Interestingly, the Ontario Championship shows 5 Gr5 drivers (although at least one was a rental) scoring this year (2 last year) but still has 10 Gr2 drivers. (4 last year) Because this was a wholesale revision. That suggests everything was a consideration. Yes and no. Few of us would be doing this if we weren't 'competitive' types. Entry numbers had nothing to do with the cancellations. One year was fire hazard level. Two years were a lack of people deluded enough to help organise the event. (I understand PFR is struggling for 'day of' volunteers as well) As did HANS Devices and FIA Seats. The hit from those was heavy for organisers and took, probably, four years to recover. Unless the competitors are successful in appealing to CARS to change the rules to allow larger displacement turbo engines. Actually, it also includes the 2.5l engines from VW, Mazda and others. First Rally: 2001 Driver (7), Co-Driver (44) Drivers (16) Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4) Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0) Last Updated, January 4, 2015 ![]()
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/11/2012 02:42PM by Morison. |
Morison Banned Super Moderator Location: Calgary, AB Join Date: 03/27/2009 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,798 Rally Car: (ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought) |
Happy to stand corrected. I even took a look back at the 2011 CRC standings and in terms of starters in G5 the count was 2,2,1,1,3,3. Finishers were 1,1,0,1,1,0. 12 entries total from 6 unique drivers. (G2 was 4,2,7,3,2,5 starters and 0,1,4,1,2,3 for finishers - 23 entries from 14 unique drivers. 2012, so far, is 1,2,0,0 for starters and 1,0,0,0 for finishers. 3 entries from 3 unique drivers nationally. Then get in touch with Darryl and Ray and make sure they hear your concerns and how you would like to see the new rules changed. If I were suitably pissed off I'd copy the entire board, and office, on my email. All the email addresses are available online. First Rally: 2001 Driver (7), Co-Driver (44) Drivers (16) Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4) Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0) Last Updated, January 4, 2015 ![]()
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/11/2012 02:27PM by Morison. |
Morison Banned Super Moderator Location: Calgary, AB Join Date: 03/27/2009 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,798 Rally Car: (ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought) |
One of the strange things happeing in this discussion is that people are saying that Gr5 cars are being restricted because the open class cars were going too fast and that it doesn't make any sense.
The thing is ... no one from CARS, or the class change committee, ever said Gr5 was being restricted because they are too fast in a global sense or that 'they' wanted to keep them slower than the open cars. I've said before, but will reiterate, that the restrictor on Gr5 cars exists to work at leveling the playing field between Gr5 and Gr2 cars. By combining the classes, 2/3 of the competitors in the class are saddled with 'underdog' cars and are even more of an underdog without the resirictors. The argument that a well driven Gr2 car can beat a poorly driven Gr5 car doesn't fly. Competitive drivers will always make sure their cars are built to the class they are in and will maximise what they can do within their budgets. If the classes were merged without restrictions, Gr2 drivers would have to make major changes if they wanted to bring a gun to a gun fight. First Rally: 2001 Driver (7), Co-Driver (44) Drivers (16) Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4) Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0) Last Updated, January 4, 2015 ![]()
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/11/2012 02:41PM by Morison. |
Ferdinand Ferdinand Trauttmansdorff Elite Moderator Location: Ottawa, ON Join Date: 12/08/2007 Age: Ancient Posts: 59 |
That has nothing to do with the Gr5 vs Gr2 issue, but is more a consequence of trying to manage a National championship in a country the size of Canada. How many of us can afford to do 7,000 km of towing? We'd rather spend our money on fun local events, regardless of whether they are National, Regional, or even American. There are some really GREAT rallies nearby. That suggests there are roughly half as many Gr5 entries and drivers as Gr2. ... and how many Gr2 in 2012? Was there a proportional drop in Gr2 as well? We're not yet "suitably pissed off". I don't even know yet what Martin's reaction to this is. Unlike some people, we've not actually been eliminated by the new rule. It's just a matter of adding a 32mm restrictor and seeing what sort of difference that makes. This new rule popped up rather suddenly. I'm just a co-driver. Car building and engine tuning is not my department. Martin will have to figure out how this affects us. He built the Nissan 240 because that's what he was familiar with. Forget trying to build anything to the Production Class rules. Way too picky and restrictive. Gr5 rules allowed for a cheap, reliable, FUN, and Open build. I sort of understand the reasoning for the new 2wd restrictions, if you're trying to combine Gr5 and Gr2 into a single Open 2wd Class. There are some pretty slow Gr2 teams who would feel justifiably handicapped if tossed together into a single class with more powerful Gr5 cars. But those slow Gr2 teams are already getting their asses kicked, and will continue to, by the fastest Gr2 cars. In fact, all the Gr5 cars are also already getting whupped by those fastest Gr2 cars. I still don't understand the point about trying to attract manufacturer interest in 2wd. Fiat won't enter unless we first eliminate, or hobble, Gr5? I don't get it. |
Do It Sidewayz Chris Martin Professional Moderator Location: Toronto, Ontario Join Date: 01/15/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 567 Rally Car: E-85 powered Impreza |
I still think the best comparison between Grp 2 and Grp 5 you could make would be Chris Duplessis and Will Orders.
Chris - As "prepped" of a Group 2 car we have....great suspension, good gearbox, great brakes, but maybe giving up some power. Will - As "prepped" of a Group 5 car we have....good suspension, great gearbox, good brakes, and piles of power...most importantly no restrictor. These guys have run 2 events, and come within seconds of each other. Both obviously great drivers, pushing their cars. 2wd does a great job of equalizing the playing field itself. The light/nimble group 2 cars, can put their modest power down, do great in the tight stuff, but run out of legs on more open roads. The generally heavier and bigger group 5 cars, struggle to put the big power down which hurts in the tight stuff, but love the more open roads. Put a 32mm on Will and he's going to cry...he'll still make big torque and spin the tires in the slow stuff, but where he used to make up time the motor will be struggling for air. This has also been proved in MaxAttack in years past. Allowing the bigger motors and scrapping the restrictor for Open 2wd will not hurt the competition...imho it will make it better. There was nothing wrong with taking the existing Group 2 and Group 5 class and saying "boy and girls, you are all fighting for the same hardware now, have at it"...pretty sure everyone would have just said "damn right, lets go!" Chris |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Godlike Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
Trautie, Trautie was villst du mit dieser scheiss-pratt?? What do you you will accomplish clogging up this discussion with facts and reality. Let me ask you directly, we must establish important things: Have you talked to one tuner? (harumph!) Well there you have it. (snorf!) Your antagonist wasn't wrong, he was just using hyperbole. That's how you have reasonable dialog, use hyperbole. Say anything you want, then when it is shown it was absurdity, you clarify that you were using hyperbole. With this new view, you can see you can never be wrong, even retroactively. John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/11/2012 03:58PM by john vanlandingham. |
heymagic Banned Infallible Moderator Location: La la land Join Date: 01/25/2006 Age: Fossilized Posts: 3,740 Rally Car: Not a Volvo |
Maybe we having trouble with the translation from Canadian to American here.. This is copied from Adams post a couple pages back : The problem of meeting a mandatory maximum average speed and keeping compeition within classes close so as to not only prevent overdog cars, but to also entice manufacturers into a series where they won't be hampered by running their new cars. Chicanes have a number of issues to them that have been discussed ad nauseum. You either A) slow the road down/new roads or cool smiley have slower cars. The other issues, again, this has been made at a national level, they have different priorities than the regions do. 2wd is not enough of a restriction, or else we wouldn't be having this conversation. I just provided you with an example at a regional where a driver (who is decent) took a turbo 2.0L car to the maximum average speed on ice/snow/mud/gravel which had 3 or 4 big chicanes on the stage. So something has to be done. This (along with a whole bunch of other issues) is how it has been decided to be resolved. I am almost quite certain that a 2wd car with 300whp throws rocks just as hard as a car with 500whp (in a sense) so I fail to see your reasoning. The car will still sound gnarly, make lots of noise, and throw rocks sideways in a stupendous fashion. Certainly points to speed here. You (CARS) are (pardon the crudeness) fucking with the very fabric that rally was made from...2wd open cars. Most everyone on here in the last 40 years started and competed with 2wd Open. There has never been a large issue with speeds nor competition. Lane is a hero to both competitors and spectators, Holmes is a hero, Utecht is a hero, Lurch the same and many others with big power 2wd cars. None of them are hated by the G2 guys nor feared. Burrus ain't askeerd, Havas neither, nor Cody Crane. So I have to call bullshit on the reasoning,,any of the changing excuses. You want to attract manufactures in even competition in P class, have at it, leave 2wd Open alone. Not enough G5 cars for a seperate class then lump the classes together. As it stands now CARS is killing the G5, not merging. You add both a size restriction and a turbo restrictor. That is like shooting someone in the head three times and then using an axe to connect the dots. You don't get 300hp out of a restricted 2.0 car without spending a large fortune btw. Low to middle 200 about it. And further more a 2.3 pinto can easily exceed 250-300 in NA trim with a smaller checkbook and see nice rpms to make it fun, but that requires a complete rebuild from a turbo setup, expensive still. Underdog or overdog (goofy thought process) is still the purchasers choice. There is nothing awe inspiring about a 2.3 Volvo turbo, nor a Merkur. Many older cars are cheap to build and own, and nearly impossible to tune to a 32mm restrictor. Very expensive if you have to get a programable engine management, a turbo machined (new turbo also, cuz the old one is too big to start with) for the restrictor and then get it tuned. Now the car won't exceed past 6K, makes no power, is harder to drive, trans is geared wrong and reliability gone. very expensive proposition in the end. It is not the job of a sanctioning body to decide which brand of car is 'fair'. Every sonuvabbitch who bought a RX intended to take advantage over the 2wd cars, GTX smashed those, Talons took advantage over the GTX, WRX over the Talon, Sti and Evo over the WRX, none of those cars were purchased for a fair fight. They were bought to either keep up or defeat someone. And thru it all the lowly 2wd guys held their own, suffered the constant drop down the overall board and enjoyed some of the best competition and comradery in the sport. This is similar judgement to Prince Harry in Vegas, might seem ok at the time but doesn't look so good from the outside world... I guess I'm too thick to get it, sorry. I think CARS needs to get 3 red Xs and sent off the stage.... |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Godlike Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
But with a relatively light car, a motor that will rev and the final drive turns that revs into torque. . A relatively heavier car, and even with no restrictor probably not revving much past 7 ever, maybe a "OK" box and maybe 4.27 final drive.
Waht we've come to call round these parts "the beauty of 2wd"
Maybe, but even with short gearing around (total box x diff) 5 :1 they'll still do 170 km/hr @ 7000
Only those who got motor fixated---which is the unfortunate fate of too many..
If they got a stable car.
That IS the point, isn't it obvious?
Yep. Should be pretty obvious. Shoul be... ![]() John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |
Morison Banned Super Moderator Location: Calgary, AB Join Date: 03/27/2009 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,798 Rally Car: (ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought) |
You seem obsessed by the term tuner. Maybe to clarify, the committee talked to several respected rally car builders and engine builders each with significant and respected competition and preparation experience. Maybe you missed it - I admitted my assessment was wrong. I'm always willing to accept when I am wrong. First Rally: 2001 Driver (7), Co-Driver (44) Drivers (16) Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4) Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0) Last Updated, January 4, 2015 ![]()
|
HiTempguy Banned Professional Moderator Location: Red Deer, Alberta Join Date: 09/13/2011 Posts: 717 Rally Car: 2002 Subaru WRX STi |
I am not CARS. I attend any meetings I possibly can, and bug individuals such as Keith and Eric relentlessly to get information. I have a responsibility to members of RallyWest to be informed about everything. Sometimes I disagree with the way Keith explains things. This you will notice in my posts. I use this, formulate an opinion, and present it. Some of it is based directly on what CARS has said at discussions (the agm, where I sat in on the organizers main meeting and then moved onto the competitors meeting). But I'm not CARS. |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Godlike Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
"Several respected rally car builders and engine builders each with significant and respected competition and preparation experience. " OOooooooooohhhhH... clarify.. I thought they said they talked with toonerz.. Gee, I wonder just what those respected rally car builders and engine builders each with significant and respected competition and preparation experience work on? See allusions may work to mollify some, but some might ask if those respected rally car builders and engine builders each with significant and respected competition and preparation experience worked with the typical broke ass dreamer beginners who have extremely limited budget, and experience, you know, like most people who are not independently wealthy. Because you must admit that it is fairly evident that somebody gave no thought to what restrictors on Group5 cars will cost and how that will slow down Open class cars.. John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |
Morison Banned Super Moderator Location: Calgary, AB Join Date: 03/27/2009 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,798 Rally Car: (ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought) |
Except that over 17 years of the Group 2 championship there has always been a winner, it has never gone unawarded. Also, from an ottawa base, you can qualify for the Canadian Championship while towing a TOTAL of 1100km. 2012 to date Gr2: 4,4,6,4 starts, 2,4,4,1 finishes - 18 entries over 12 unique drivers and two events left. YTD change over last year: raw numbers(percentage of 2011 entries): Gr2: 0,+2(200%),-1(86%),+1(133%) Gr5: -1(50%),0,-1(0%),-1(0%) But the cross border issue is still a concern for you and I urge you to make that known to CARS. If you think a groundswell of support on any web forum will be heard by CARS, you're wrong. Although the 'new' production rules are far less restrictive... but that's another can of worms. But we're back to talking about classing the drivers, not the cars. First Rally: 2001 Driver (7), Co-Driver (44) Drivers (16) Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4) Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0) Last Updated, January 4, 2015 ![]()
|
Morison Banned Super Moderator Location: Calgary, AB Join Date: 03/27/2009 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,798 Rally Car: (ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought) |
Um... rally cars and engines. (duh) In all seriousness the names of the shops don't really matter. They are, in the eyes of the committee, reputable and informed sources. I can assure you cost was a part of the discussion. Being that I was involved in discussions about the cost of restrictors to G5 cars I can assure you there was thought given to it. Restrictiors in Gr5 did not come about from the concerns about the average speeds being maxed out. First Rally: 2001 Driver (7), Co-Driver (44) Drivers (16) Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4) Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0) Last Updated, January 4, 2015 ![]()
|
hoche Michel Hoche-Mong Mod Moderator Location: Campbell, CA Join Date: 02/28/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,156 Rally Car: Golf, Golf, RX-3 |
|