BBRally Ben Bradley Godlike Moderator Location: Portland, OR Join Date: 02/07/2006 Age: Ancient Posts: 35 Rally Car: Under Construction |
It is a basic class on how to do it, with some suggestions for best practices. I have only been involved with this rally for two years, and it has always been required. I believe it's something of a compromise with a sanctioning body that doesn't fully embrace two-pass recce (as opposed to organizer-supplied notes). Maybe we're being a bit heavy-handed, I don't know. Personally I am more comfortable with newer teams having some clue on how to do it, not just sending them out in the woods with no direction on how to efficiently use their time or how to create useful notes. Keep in mind, in Washington and Oregon this is the only event with two-pass recce, so some local competitors don't have much experience with it, unless they have competed in British Columbia or Alberta. Ben |
HiTempguy Banned Infallible Moderator Location: Red Deer, Alberta Join Date: 09/13/2011 Posts: 717 Rally Car: 2002 Subaru WRX STi |
One area where I disagree with you John. Simple, BASIC notes are the key to going fast. They don't have to be detailed, they don't have to be complex. But North American note making is pitiful (and one of the reasons North American competitors are slow). My notes are super basic, but they include every corner, crest, and caution. Without them, I wouldn't be nearly as quick as I am. Properly written, BASIC notes will not only help competitors keep their cars on the road, but be safer, unless they are driving so slow sans notes that it doesn't matter. I refer to your own words in my quote; proper notes prevents us dumb drivers from thinking too hard/much while in the race car ![]() Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/04/2012 01:21PM by HiTempguy. |
BBRally Ben Bradley Godlike Moderator Location: Portland, OR Join Date: 02/07/2006 Age: Ancient Posts: 35 Rally Car: Under Construction |
|
HiTempguy Banned Infallible Moderator Location: Red Deer, Alberta Join Date: 09/13/2011 Posts: 717 Rally Car: 2002 Subaru WRX STi |
Hmm, not quite so sure. John has been around long enough (and is curmudgeony enough :p ) to be in the note hater camp I'd think ![]() I'll wait and see what his reply is, the suspense is killing me! ![]() |
hoche Michel Hoche-Mong Senior Moderator Location: Campbell, CA Join Date: 02/28/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,156 Rally Car: Golf, Golf, RX-3 |
Ugh, I wouldn't touch BASIC notes with a ten-foot pole. I usually prefer them in C, with certain segments optimized with handcrafted assembly. Self-righteous douche canoe |
HiTempguy Banned Infallible Moderator Location: Red Deer, Alberta Join Date: 09/13/2011 Posts: 717 Rally Car: 2002 Subaru WRX STi |
|
tipo158 Alan Perry Elite Moderator Location: Bainbridge Island, WA Join Date: 02/20/2008 Age: Ancient Posts: 430 |
According to the RA rules (Article 7.3.E), when an event allows teams to create pace notes, it must offer pace notes training. The rule doesn't require that teams attend the training. Personally, I used to think that, because local competitors don't get much experience creating their own pace notes, that the training should be mandatory. Then I saw that BC and AB were able to do OK offering but not requiring the training there. alan |
NoCoast Grant Hughes Professional Moderator Location: Whitefish, MT Join Date: 01/11/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 6,818 Rally Car: BMW |
I would say that probably applies to a large segment of the field at most of the rallies I've been to. But alot of that is due to factors such as poor braking, excessive use of left foot braking, and lack of attack. That is what has led me to believe that a focus on two pass recce, repeated stages, hill climbs, and small regional events recurring regularly would allow drivers to create notes, fine tune those note, no longer require those notes (because they've done the stage 10 times now), and thus being able to discover the limits of their car would lead to improved speed and skill across the board. Grant Hughes |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Infallible Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
See note from Ben..and try and remember, I'm never really 100% serious, and never really 100% not serious. Expect the unexpected.
Really? Dayum mang I thought it was opening the throttle FULL and then working hard on braking as hard as possible while maintaining some degree of control, you know? Like DRIVING? I'll try just reading notes but I was pretty sure you have to gas it and shift gears UP to go fast, but if you say its notes, I guess just sitting with the notes in the lap is THE KEY, well times have changed. I guess.
Ah! agreement!
. Oh, really? I thought it was poor vehicle choice, poor compoment choice, fixation of motor, lack of experience driving---and judging the road, ignoring critical components like gear sets, failing to open the throttle, and braking like they has ricketts and couldn't push on the brake pedal. especially the lame ass braking. Live and learn.. Amazing what we learn on forums!
You're quick? You? I thought you had fast cars..didn't know you were quick. I can see how you'd believe that but malheuresement that's merde pur.. I guess since you're a young pup brought in post Notes and eating a diet of Forum bullshit excuse about safety, it's understandable repeat stuff about safety which people always throw around because many know if you say SAFETY!!!!! that nobody dares argue against SAFETY!!!!! (Think of the children ferfucksake!!!!!!). Notes are about going faster..... You could look at it like say Intercooling.. It allows more while maintaining the same margin.... OR a same with a bigger margin. Way back in the last century first event using blown up photocopies of the map in the Supps---organiser supplied map so we were legal, I was on stages 12-14 minutes longe and using same tires as the day before was a full gear higher everywhere and was about 1m30s to 1m 40s faster. Started with second hand tires which then were run Saturday 70 miles so they were beat---and still massive improvements in speed, especially at higher speeds....so much higher speed, with same safety margin.. Notes are about speed.
Well there goes the rationale then for all but 3-4 North American competitors.
Oh do i have a great video snippet from Loeb for you.. He says basically the same thing. John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/05/2012 01:34AM by john vanlandingham. |
shiza Dan Norkus Elite Moderator Location: Goldsboro, NC Join Date: 01/10/2010 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 290 Rally Car: 94 Integra |
|
HiTempguy Banned Infallible Moderator Location: Red Deer, Alberta Join Date: 09/13/2011 Posts: 717 Rally Car: 2002 Subaru WRX STi |
Sure it is John, but there is only so much driver's can do (small brains and all) to know when to hit the throttle hard and when to brake hard and when not to brake at all. Surprisingly, this isn't the 1800's of rallying anymore ![]() .
Well for one thing, gearsets never slowed anyone down, they just prevented them from accelerating as fast (I can play the word game too John ![]() Hmm, pretty sure Duplessis is getting stomped by the competition across the pond. And Ken was/still is getting stomped. Both have a true season of competition under their belts. Both have said a huge difference was in their note making ability after competing in the WRC. It IS "one" of the reasons. But the guys below David, Antoine, Pat, Leo, Ken are slower for numerous reasons.
Hmm, I guess you could say that. Is a Talon a top 10 nationally competitive car? Damn, now I REALLY wish I hadn't crashed it, I didn't know what I had. The wierdest thing I find is I'm arguing with someone who (arguably) was "slow" when rallying. What does he know anyways? He won an event against a whole bunch of slow people? I thought he just had a fast properly prepared car... Surprisingly enough John, I base my definition of quick on stage times. I also have nothing to prove to you (or anyone else anywhere for that matter).
See, you were able to go faster at the same amount of safety. You COULD have went faster before, but it wouldn't have been nearly as safe. There is a theoretical limit to how fast a given car can travel down a road. Notes make that limit safer to attain (or, the same amount of "safe" to attain as slower speeds without maps/tulips/notes). Thank you for proving my point for me John. |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Infallible Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
amusing reply to follow.
but kid, you're from slightly to sooooooooooooo wrong on many points.. But I like you, even if you are from Alberta, so I'll help you, I won't hold that against you. John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |
HiTempguy Banned Infallible Moderator Location: Red Deer, Alberta Join Date: 09/13/2011 Posts: 717 Rally Car: 2002 Subaru WRX STi |
Hey, opinions are like assholes, everyone's got one right? I don't see anyone here suggesting someones opinion is more or less valid than someone elses I'd hope. It certainly doesn't mean I have to agree with someone elses opinion either ![]() |
hoche Michel Hoche-Mong Senior Moderator Location: Campbell, CA Join Date: 02/28/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,156 Rally Car: Golf, Golf, RX-3 |
Oh, sorry. I thought I made that clear years ago. All of your opinions are less valid than mine. Back to the subject at hand, yay, Mt. Hood! I will be there as part of the rallydata scoring team. Self-righteous douche canoe |
12xalt "oh! you're the one!" Mega Moderator Location: Hazel Dell, WA Join Date: 02/22/2008 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,390 Rally Car: 1974 Dodge Colt, under construction |
|