Banned Junior Moderator Location: La la land Join Date: 01/25/2006 Age: Fossilized Posts: 3,740 Rally Car: Not a Volvo |
Chris Kobayashi Mega Moderator Location: Seattle, Wash. Join Date: 02/15/2012 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 319 Rally Car: 2000 ford focus zx3 |
Anders Green Professional Moderator Location: Raleigh, NC Join Date: 03/30/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,478 Rally Car: Parked |
Billy Irvin Professional Moderator Location: Puyallup Washington Join Date: 06/06/2010 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 156 |
Alex Staidle Elite Moderator Location: Δx = ħ/2Δp Join Date: 08/21/2009 Age: Settling Down Posts: 1,719 Rally Car: Various Heaps |
Banned Junior Moderator Location: La la land Join Date: 01/25/2006 Age: Fossilized Posts: 3,740 Rally Car: Not a Volvo |
Brian Johnson Professional Moderator Location: Park City, UT Join Date: 12/17/2006 Posts: 166 Rally Car: Co-Driver - Old School Motorsports WRX |
Stinkfinger Lipschitz Godlike Moderator Location: Uranus Join Date: 02/17/2008 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 325 |
steve czwalga Professional Moderator Location: Pittsburgh, PA Join Date: 09/16/2011 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 376 Rally Car: 95 awd celica |
Anders Green Professional Moderator Location: Raleigh, NC Join Date: 03/30/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,478 Rally Car: Parked |
Banned Professional Moderator Location: John and Skyes Magic Love liar Join Date: 08/24/2007 Posts: 2,154 |
Banned Junior Moderator Location: La la land Join Date: 01/25/2006 Age: Fossilized Posts: 3,740 Rally Car: Not a Volvo |
Well...my vote was for NRS, nothing against USAC. It isn't my event but Steve McQuaid is my friend (over 30 years and still working) so I support his decision.
Do we need a 3rd sanctioning body? Hell no. Two are confusing enough for competitors and organizers. I doubt we'll have 3 for long though. I suspect RA will implode before 1/2 season. There should be no way organizers and competitors scrape by hoping for affordable entry fees and break even events just to put several hundred thousand dollars into Foggs pocket. The sport really owes him nothing. USAC is well established and while not a rally oriented organization, they are well versed in motorsports. They have an interest in rally apparently, and are interested in the RallyCross programs, members of ACCUS and there by associated with FIA (not saying that is good or bad...) While many details are to be worked out, Olympus will pretty much look, to competitors, the same as always and affordable for regional teams. Scoring and competition will be the standard we are used to, hopefully the internet scoring will be better, scrutineering will be the same friendly, smiling faces (depending on my mood  ). I am told we will be using standard rally procedures and safety requirements we are all used to. So yes, no rule book, but you'll need to meet the same requirements as any other event would require. Olympus organizers are running the event , USAC has indicated they are not wanting to be dark overlords.
I doubt anyone will notice any significant differences. The June date, while close to Idaho, opens up the number of roads we have to use, lessens any storm water influences and will be well before the normal fire season. Should be nothing but plusses for the local rally community. The bigger question should be why the community would think it is ok to spend $20 to 30,000 more per event for RA sanctions with all the baggage and controversy than going NRS or USAC or self insured. |
Alan Perry Elite Moderator Location: Bainbridge Island, WA Join Date: 02/20/2008 Age: Ancient Posts: 430 |
Anders Green Professional Moderator Location: Raleigh, NC Join Date: 03/30/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,478 Rally Car: Parked |
Stinkfinger Lipschitz Godlike Moderator Location: Uranus Join Date: 02/17/2008 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 325 |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.