john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Elite Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
Here's some discussion from a Czech guy who has some relationship with the Skoda crews---I have written him in discussions of modern LOOOOOOOOOONG travel suspension, and he had "Only a small file of xx events spring set ups and will look for more complete info"
![]() http://www.motorsportforums.com/wrc/128975-%5Bwrc%5D-news-rumours-part-ii-692.html
There's some flack from an obnoxious noob know-it-all repeating the party Line and making huge assumtions--clearly never having sat in a rally car.. then:
Mirek answers clearly:
And then today gets better:
Obviously a man of great patience. John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |
TronDD Tim Meunier Godlike Moderator Location: Boston, MA Join Date: 10/27/2011 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 252 Rally Car: 96 Subaru Impreza |
I don't see the mechanics of how a HANS could cause lumbar vertebrae injury in a vertical impact.
Vertical impact is one of those things that make me nervous. Years ago there was a show that talked about injuries and deaths in light air craft crashes due to the vertical impact more so than frontal and they were working on a seat with a suspension to absorb the impact. I've seen a guy die in a suspensionless drag car when it rolled onto its side and hit the wall. Once our car's suspension is out of the equation, there is nothing keeping your spine from getting all of the impact. Seems to me it would be the harness keeping you upright, though. How would the Hans play a part in that direction? Tim. |
One of the heaviest and densest parts of your body (with certain members of this site providing wonderful examples of the latter) is your head. If your neck is held straight, the only place for the sudden downward force (provided by your head's inertia when you land after a jump) to go is into your spine. If your neck were allowed to move, some of the force would be mitigated. At least, that's the theory. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/25/2013 08:47PM by Iowa999. |
tl;dr - blah, blah, blah, blah (aimed directly at someone) followed by "but I won't read your reply" I can see why you like him. |
TronDD Tim Meunier Godlike Moderator Location: Boston, MA Join Date: 10/27/2011 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 252 Rally Car: 96 Subaru Impreza |
|
Exactly. As the person arguing with Mirek pointed out, helmets increase cervical fractures (due to added mass to the head). But they save more lives by being, well, helmets, so there are retained. H&N devices also have downsides, such as taking the flexibility out of the neck. The question is not whether H&N devices have ANY downsides; the question is whether they prevent more or less injuries than they contribute to. This could easily depend on the type of racing, but it's not a slam-dunk in either direction, given the data we have right now. And a broken neck is a tad worse than collapsed lumbar vertibrae, so I see the FIA's point.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/25/2013 09:16PM by Iowa999. |
JohnLane John Lane Super Moderator Location: Lynden Washington Join Date: 01/14/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 725 Rally Car: The Fire Breathing Monster |
I don't see anywhere in my post of my encounter of the brainiac in the Prius about tailgating it. Good reason for it dumbshit.... I didn't tailgate the Prius.... It is par for the course on your part to ASSume/SPIN the worst. Also no surprise that you delight in bringing up my having fallen asleep while driving a total of once in my lifetime.... I will run into you in person at some point. Don't be an asshole.
You of all people.... Priceless. JohnLane Overkill is consistently more fun |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Elite Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
No, ouch to lumbar: ![]() We don't always have to ourselves understand everything of a process to see the after effects of that process. Sometimes, like in this case, you see a single element change in the equation, then compare previous decades of observation and we see a sudden upsurge in a new outcome and we can make a good bet at the causation. The thing I've seen a LOT of on the billions of French tarmac vids I've seen is a car--low cause its tarmac, and low means short travel suspension, bottoming rear suspension badly to the point the cars are bounced up onto just the front wheels..looks scary and is! Now those hundreds now who have talked with me on suspesnion know I say that for conceptual purposes that front is about control and is what you feel in your fingertips "and rear suspension is what you feel in your butt". So heavy bottoming of short travel suspension and crews forced by office drones and bureaucrats to use HANS suddenly 20 fractured LOWER backs.... Now I just had 2 spine surgeries: cervical at C5/C6 followed about 6 weeks later by surgery at L4/L4....mine weren't fractured but the disc had been crushed to nothingness and the nerves which exit the spine to power things were "severely crushed"....It was incapacitating, no-drug-really-did-anything, grind your teeth to powder pain.. I don't think in the rush to protect the assets of some guy who owns a corporation sanctioning rallies I want to be forced to use/do something that is now implicated in that kind of injury...and implicated by people with far more experience, and far more data to help them analyze things.. John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |
SeanP Sean Lane Infallible Moderator Location: Sacramento, CA Join Date: 07/29/2011 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 334 Rally Car: 2000 Dodge Neon G2, bruised |
Looking at this photo, I just don't get what caused the impact and damage. The little TR7 got some air over the crest/jump, but they didn't go that far in the air. I am assuming those white staggered signs in the foreground are the distance markers that the WRC cars were measure against. Did the TR7 bottom out and crush the spines of both driver and co-driver upon landing?
image link fail. see this: http://500px.com/photo/44127638?from=set/824588 Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/26/2013 01:46AM by SeanP. |
Doivi Clarkinen Banned Godlike Moderator Location: the end of the universe Join Date: 02/12/2006 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,432 Rally Car: 1980 Opel Ascona B |
Look at this photo: http://500px.com/photo/44127636?from=set/824588 Look how the dashboard is folded up, the left side looks smashed in. They impacted something on the driver side hard. What is that white thing to the left side of the rear of the car? Did they hit that? |
heymagic Banned Mod Moderator Location: La la land Join Date: 01/25/2006 Age: Fossilized Posts: 3,740 Rally Car: Not a Volvo |
Speed doesn't kill, it is the sudden stop. A sideways hit puts tremendous stress on the neck, more if the weight of a helmet is involved. There is also the risk of soft tissue damage. Lungs, heart, brain and a few other organs bouncing or being torn.
HNRs don't hold the neck solid. There is lots of room for vertical travel as well as side to side. Blaming or even implying the Germany deaths on HNRs is pretty physhic at this point. I'm sorry for the losses, our sport has certainly had enough for a while, both on tarmac AND gravel. |
themxracer121 Adam Hardin Mod Moderator Location: Festus, MO Join Date: 01/04/2013 Age: Settling Down Posts: 9 Rally Car: VW Jetta |
All this talk of HANS potentially causing injuries reminds me of a few years ago when Leatt neck braces started becoming popular in motocross, they were designed to prevent injury in a very specific type of crash - when the rider lands directly on the top of the helmet. The force from the crash was distributed to the shoulders and torso, so in other lesser crashes they could possibly cause collarbone, shoulder, or back injuries that would not have normally ocurred.
Motorsports are inherently dangerous and it's always tragic when an accident like this occurs but I guess my question would be is it worth potentially causing a few more lesser injuries (arguably I would say that a severe lower back injury is lesser than a paralyzing or worse neck injury) to save a few lives? Neck braces are not required that I know of in any form of motocross, and right now it's a pretty even split of riders who wear them and riders who don't. FWIW I have worn one for about a year now and have had some pretty serious crashes with no adverse affects from the brace. *i'm specifically talking about the HANS causing lower back injuries, not this fatal accident as it's just speculation as to the cause of death at this point. Adam Hardin #122 VW Jetta Mk3 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk2OLsNlm1z7gWe-Q-hTx8Q |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Elite Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
Nobody is suggesting that, separate ranting on separate topics. John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |
Morison Banned Mod Moderator Location: Calgary, AB Join Date: 03/27/2009 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,798 Rally Car: (ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought) |
First off: The deaths in Germany are truly a sad incident and I feel not only for the families of the driver and co-driver but also for the volunteers and emergency workers who had to deal with the aftermath of the incident.
That is what this thread should be about. John: You really should be ashamed of yourself for pouncing on the still warm corpses and showing the level of your insensitivity and arrogance by not uttering a word of compassion before condemning the choice of car, the crews choices on the day and then anyone who chooses to take part in tarmac rallies. Then you follow that up by spreading the unsubstantiated rumour that a spectator or photographer was also killed in the incident without so much as couching it with 'early reports said...' Nope, you heard it once, didn't follow up and assumed it was fact and repeated it as such - all within hours of the incident when information was still coming out. In all seriousness, I think you're having some issues. The number of posts you've put online that are nothing but attacks is uncharacteristically high, and unusually aggressive. Your commitment to your ideas and positions is also unreasonably high. There is an old saying that 'if everyone around you is an asshole, they might not be the problem.' Far from being a push to uniformity, the phrase is more about being open minded and less rigid. For what its worth, when I start thinking everyone around me is stupid or just 'doesn't get it' I take that as a sign that I need to slow down and think about what's going on in my own life. On the issue of the HANS device, I'd love to see the report from the investigation. Without seeing the method of investigation, the data and how it was interpreted it really is impossible to reasonably discuss the findings. Did they just look at the number of incidents? Did they do dummy testing? Did they look at other changes, specifically shortened shoulder harnesses? Frankly, the first red flag is that the investigation was performed by 'specialised doctors.' (Common use of 'doctors' suggests physicians and not PHds in physics, kinesiology or any other applicable field. To be meaningful, the investigation would have to had looked at the mechanics of the injury, not just the instances of it.) If I look at the HANS device, I really don't see how it can significantly increase loading on the body in a way that would lead to back injuries. What I CAN see is that the shortened harnesses recommended for use with the HANS could restrict the torso from some up/down elasticity and THAT could lead to some injuries in the right conditions. Like some have said, this may also be a case of a lesser injury becoming more common as a result of protecting against much more serious injuries. An extreme example would be the increase in elbows hitting door bars when they became mandatory. (And no, I'm not equating a fractured vertebra with a sore elbow - it's intentional exaggeration to make a point.) First Rally: 2001 Driver (7), Co-Driver (44) Drivers (16) Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4) Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0) Last Updated, January 4, 2015 ![]()
|
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Elite Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
You stupid cunt Moronson.
I said I read the reports when the news was only hours old--Noonish CET and 0745 ish PST... other people aren't prefect humans in everything they say cunt, so initial reports I read in several places were in error, I reported what I read..at THE TIME I READ IT..... AS IF IT MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE YOU MORON IF THE DRIVER KILLED A PHOTOGRAPHER OR A CO-DRIVER OR A "ORINARY" SPECTATOR. My syspathy is with the inncoent person killed--you mortonic asshole READ THE NAME of the classic car EXHIBITION RUN, cunt. Slowly SidewaysÂâ„¢ You cannot understand that shithead? EXHIBITION, so the asshole who is just driving for fun that he loses control and kills himself, well meh, he won't do that again. But a fool that misses the point of having fun in his old car and in so losing control kills innocent people--that asshole is not going to get pity or sympathy.. The sympathy for the victim(s) in what I write is obvious, you are an idiot--we have known this for a long time that only the most mind agonizingly pedantic droning boring declarative sentences have any chance of making an impression on you Rocky Mountain Granite filled skull. Save your poor imitation "I am outraged! oooooooOOO sniffle snifle" pretend outrage for the idiots who think you mean what you say.. And isn't it obvious that we don't care if YOU can't see...blah blah You are a former car salesman--a photographer, what else? You cannot even consider simple thought exercises, and if you cannot foisrst consider that then any subsequent blabbering is pointless. You are about as bright as the idiot in that thread I linked to.. Another keyboard expert who can figure out instantly with data, without discussion , instantly respond with dismissal. Talk about stupid:
Fractured vertebrae a lesser injury you liken to banging your elbow.. Fucking just shut up Morison, you are truly an idiot. Go fracture your vertebra bending your spine to pull your head out of your ass. John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |