Like the title says "What makes a good rally car?"
I've searched the forums here and elsewhere, I'm not looking for get this car or that car but the nuts and bolts of it. Not even the dreaded but always entertaining fwd vs rwd vs awd issue. But dimensions and the like. please also suggest which class of car you are referring to. wheelbase front vs rear vs mid engine wheel sizes etc... Thanks, Bill P.S. 1st post so Hiya,Hello,and Howdy.... |
derek Derek Bottles Professional Moderator Location: Lopez Island/ Seattle WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 853 Rally Car: Past: 323, RX2, GTI. Next up M3 ? |
Any car can be a good rally car, with the application of money time and brains.
Having driven a few cars in anger down rally roads I would say predicable and confidance inspireing are very high on the list of important traits. Strong is also key - others would call that reliable. One factor that is often over looked - the car should be fun, the driver should like driving it because it will cost a lot of money to earn the right to spend the time behind the wheel so it better return a lot of smiles per mile. One question you ask is easy wheels should be 15" this is the size you can get lots of good tires for and has room for brakes on gravel. There are 16" rally tires but they are rare and cost much more then 15" rally tires. There are also 14" tyres but they are very limited in compound, treads, widths etc as almost everyone uses 15" tyres. Most people think around 100 inches is right but it is not a proven fact you need to be there. No one has had a winning effort in mid or rear engine except the factories since the days the 911 or Renult Alpine. (IE if you spend huge amounts of money mid engine cars work). High center of gravity things like trucks and SUV's have never done that well and the public comments of the factory teams tell us that they are going to massive efforts to lower the center of gravity in the cars. We likely do not wish to go to that extreme but I would not try a Sicon B or Toyota Matrix (or a H3/Rav4/Explorer/tundra etc) as they are rather tall and handling does count for something. Besides the slab sides of the B will make it much harder to put back on its feet after tipping over! OK have fun. Derek In the long run reality always wins. |
What Derek said was spot on, I was going to say that's a very dogmatic question and it could be argued to the cows come home. It sounds like it's your first foray into rally and all I would add is pick a car that has been done before. Cheapness of parts and cars is a bonus. And as Derek said, a low centre of gravity is obviously a given.
Andrew M Onterrible 30ish |
Pete Pete Remner Professional Moderator Location: Cleveland, Ohio Join Date: 01/11/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 2,022 |
derek Wrote:
> No > one has had a winning effort in mid or rear engine > except the factories since the days the 911 or > Renult Alpine. (IE if you spend huge amounts of > money mid engine cars work). Maybe that's because, with two or three exceptions, mid-engined and rear-engined cars are incredibly expensive to begin with. Sure, there are MR2s (cramped, weak) and Super Beetles (hard to find, cramped) but beyond that... the papers aren't brimming with cheap 037s. Pete Remner Cleveland, Ohio 1984 RX-7 (rallycross thing) 1978 Silence is golden, but duct tape is silver. |
Phlyan Pan Travis Sleight Elite Moderator Location: Saratoga Springs, NY Join Date: 12/16/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 45 Rally Car: Moved on....wasn't much of a rally car anyway |
) and Super
> Beetles (hard to find, cramped) > > > > > Pete Remner > Cleveland, Ohio > > 1984 RX-7 reshell > 1978 Cramped...maybe a little. But super beetles aren't hard to find. There's like eleventy billion of them in the world. And parts are quite cheap compared to a lot of other options. Now if you're saying that super beetles already made into rally cars are hard to find...yeah you're probably right. But the car itself is still very easily located considering how long it's been since they were sold in the US. "Time to unpimp ze auuto." sleightc (A.T.) Yahoo {DOT} com |
Pete Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > the papers aren't brimming with cheap 037s. What about a Stratos replica.. they aren't free, but not super expensive. Of course you would have to get it shipped from Britain/Europe. Andrew M Onterrible 30ish |
randyzimmer randy zimmer Infallible Moderator Location: Buffalo, NY Join Date: 03/12/2006 Age: Fossilized Posts: 196 Rally Car: rallycross 13B Miata |
Do you mean picking a make and model or building up?
In other series, you go wheel to wheel and you can easily see where you are good and others are better - but not in rally. Even there, if VanDiemens make up 30 of the 32 cars in the race, you'd better be pretty good at figuring things out to run a different chassis! If you are starting out, you don't know shit about shit so when your Super Beetle needs a part or you need to know if, "is it normal to veer right every time I hit the brakes?" no one will know and be able to say, "yeah, I have one of those" or "yeah, they all do that" like if you're using what everyone else has. If you get really good and have a budget, sure! Blow it on a science project, it just may be a world-beater. But be prepared for going it alone on every facet of package. |
Pete Pete Remner Professional Moderator Location: Cleveland, Ohio Join Date: 01/11/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 2,022 |
Phlyan Pan Wrote:
> > Cramped...maybe a little. But super beetles > aren't hard to find. There's like eleventy > billion of them in the world. And parts are quite > cheap compared to a lot of other options. True on the "cheap", but jeez. Ever since the New Beetle came out, everyone thinks their rotted out aircooled with no heater channels and the passenger seat leaning against the door (ahem) is a collector's item worth $1000-1500. Anything not sorely in need of a new everything seems to be $3k and up. Even I can find XR4Tis and other, better things for far, far less. That said, they do have a nice combination of light weight, thrusty grip, and light weight. Pete Remner Cleveland, Ohio 1984 RX-7 (rallycross thing) 1978 Silence is golden, but duct tape is silver. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/17/2007 06:16PM by Pete. |
hoche Michel Hoche-Mong Super Moderator Location: Campbell, CA Join Date: 02/28/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,156 Rally Car: Golf, Golf, RX-3 |
Replicas are not allowed in R-A. Dunno about CARS. Something like the Stratos (which had the rollbar integrated in the chassis) would be especially hard to get teched, too. Besides, they're known to be terribly cramped and twitchy.
Self-righteous douche canoe |
david amor david amor Infallible Moderator Location: Stoney Creek Ontario Join Date: 03/22/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 458 |
This topic just gets beaten to death and it becomes a little tiring even reading the same thing over and over. Not that I never asked the same thing. Read Randys post carefully (and you can kinda tell by his "tone" that he's a bit tired of answering this since he's probably answered it for 20 or 30 years) It's pretty simple; look at the cars people are having sucess with. Define sucess however you like- winning, reliability most fun etc- and then look at what makes THOSE cars good. But I like how JVL said it best:
"Its so common when folks say "I want to do something different (or "original"" I say "Yeah? Then DRIVE the car GOOD." Gone fishing |
Rich Smith Rich Smith Mod Moderator Location: North Bend, WA Join Date: 01/27/2006 Age: Fossilized Posts: 254 |
For myself, there is no substitute for a LIGHT WEIGHT rallycar:
- Something in the 2,000-2500 lb range is very attainable in 2WD. - Something in the 170-220 HP range is also pretty easy. - Something low tech for dependablility. Most light weight cars can be made to handle well and predictably. Changing out the OEM suspension is a given. Rich Smith |
NoCoast Grant Hughes Super Moderator Location: Whitefish, MT Join Date: 01/11/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 6,818 Rally Car: BMW |
http://www.rengaskanava.fi/mikakiracing/mikakiracing-kouvola2007-ek1.wmv
http://www.rengaskanava.fi/mikakiracing/rallycars.php First in Group F at a National event in Finland on the car's premiere event. Used V6 models are going for around $3500 here. Of course, one has to spend another $20,000 on gearbox, diff, and suspension, but it'd be a Golf killer. Grant Hughes |
derek Derek Bottles Professional Moderator Location: Lopez Island/ Seattle WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 853 Rally Car: Past: 323, RX2, GTI. Next up M3 ? |
BMW is still using inline 6. Interesting to see they are using the stock motor, that should be dependable.
Good for them winning the first time out in the car. Not sure they have $20k of extra stuff in that, the gearbox is likely $3k the suspenssion $4-5k Cage etc $4k Brakes $3k Looks to me like less then $15,000 using all new bits The same as any rally car. Wonder if RA would let you enter it into PGT and Gp5? That way you could get two trophys? In the long run reality always wins. |
NoCoast Grant Hughes Super Moderator Location: Whitefish, MT Join Date: 01/11/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 6,818 Rally Car: BMW |
Yeah, but you'd have to import it all and the exchange rate is fucking poop. I forgot to type brakes, but I was thinking it, which adds another probably 4ish with AP/Alcon stuff.
>Looks to me like less then $15,000 using all new bits The same as any rally car. I was telling my wife that just the other day how it doesn't really matter which car, you're going to spend around $15K. Grant Hughes |
nick the brit Nick Taylor Mega Moderator Location: North Hollywood, CA Join Date: 01/25/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 149 Rally Car: 1995 Subaru Impreza WRX |
NoCoast Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- http://www.rengaskanava.fi/mikakiracing/rallycars.php lol at the description of the BMW Dash "Shed Fluff Dashboard" Nick Taylor. Knobhead. Los Angeles, CA. |