nick leone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Go to:
> http://www.truck-lite.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10001&storeId=10001&productId=64057&langId=-1
>
> 7 in LED headlights.
>
> Nick
>
> Nick Leone
> Former scca member

How much $$$

---

____________________________________________________________-

One. Class -- 2WD

www.quantumrallysport.com

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Quantum-Rally-Sport/281129179600?ref=nf

nick leone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Go to:
>
>
> 7 in LED headlights.
>
> Nick
>
> Nick Leone
> Former scca member

Aren't those just stock headlight equivalents for mounting in the oem location?

---

Quote
Morison
[jvl] Ohh noooohs! There's an h'off tawpik thread in the gent-urinal dick-cushion four-hum. THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!![/jvl]

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/21/2010 10:42AM by RallyTaco.

They're essentially a replacement for the "Par 56" lamp. I've seen references to that all over the place, and I know we used to use Par 64's for theater lights. Just a generic sealed, round, incandescent lamp.

Price isn't listed there, nor is any necessary technical specifications.

From my perspective, I look at the beam pattern first, followed by brightness, followed by power consumption.

--sarget

---

---** To be in compliance with the Anarchy **---
Jorden R. Kleier
Baraboo, Wisconsin, USA
1990 Mazdog Protege 4WD
1973

I changed the light rules last year or the year before... The NRS rules now say it just has to be "symmetric", not even. It's just to prevent stupid, crappy mismatched lights that would look junky.

Anders

---

Grassroots rally. It's what I think about.

Anders Green Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I changed the light rules last year or the year
> before... The NRS rules now say it just has to be
> "symmetric", not even. It's just to prevent
> stupid, crappy mismatched lights that would look
> junky.

Curious: Wouldn't stupid, crappy mismatched lights be something of a safety hazard? I'd think even the suggestion that a rule was based upon appearance would open up a can of worms.

COMPETITORS SHALL, PRIOR TO EACH EVENT, HAVE ANY AND ALL COSMETIC REPAIRS DONE AT AN ASE-CERTIFIED FACILITY. DENTS, SCUFFS, SCRAPES AND ALL OTHER EXTERIOR BLEMISHES (TO INCLUDE INTERIOR BLEMISHES SUCH AS FADED, WORN OR OTHERWISE DIRTY SEATS) WILL SERVE AS GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL FROM THE EVENT, WITH ALL FEES FORFEIT. ADDITIONALLY, ALL RALLY CARS MUST BE WASHED, WAXED, AND FULLY DETAILED BY THE EVENT SPONSOR PRIOR TO TECH.

:shrug

---

Brian Driggs | KG7KCA | PHX, AZ | 89 Pajero
alterius non sit qui suus esse potest

I know the CARS ruleset has a requirement that cars be 'presentable' at scrutineering. No holes, rust or other visual flaws. (It also isn't heavily policed)

Most HTAs have regulation over accessory lights and where and how many can be placed on the car. Typically they call for them to be added in pairs.

---

First Rally: 2001
Driver (7), Co-Driver (44)
Drivers (16)
Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4)
Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0)
Last Updated, January 4, 2015

Quote
john vanlandingham
Blame is for idiots. losers.

Presentable got to the extreme under the Spitzner regime. I think you were even supposed to have crew in matching polo shirts. I like the center light idea ala the Tucker. You could probably fit three on each side of the center for a 9 light bar. Hmmm. Headlight - driving - fog - pencil - center - pencil - fog - driving - headlight:



Anybody want to photoshop it? BTW, nice cars in background not photoshopped! I see a Porsche and an Austin-Healey on the left, but what is on the right?

---

"Talk about drugs. Driving a car like that, going that fast, it’s like all the drugs at once." - Tommy Byrne

"Now, Pinky, if by any chance you are captured during this mission, remember you are Gunther Heindriksen from Appenzell. You moved to Grindelwald to drive the cog train to Murren. Can you repeat that?" - The Brain

"what is on the right?"

A TVR Griffith

JT

DR1665 Wrote:
> I'd think
> even the suggestion that a rule was based upon
> appearance would open up a can of worms.

I didn't "suggest" it, I said it. That's the reason. It's cosmetic. I know it's more fun to imagine insurance company cabals and backrooms filled with unpublished safety data that competitors don't get to see.... but that's the reason.

Cheers,
Anders

---

Grassroots rally. It's what I think about.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/27/2010 12:37PM by Anders Green.

Anders Green Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DR1665 Wrote:
> > I'd think
> > even the suggestion that a rule was based
> upon
> > appearance would open up a can of worms.
>
> I didn't "suggest" it, I said it. That's the
> reason. It's cosmetic. I know it's more fun to
> imagine insurance company cabals and backrooms
> filled with unpublished safety data that
> competitors don't get to see.... but that's the
> reason.

YOU! YEAH YOU, WITH THE THREE LIGHTS ON YER RALLY CAR! WE DON'T TAKE KINDLY TO YER TYPE AROUND THESE PARTS. YOU GIT ON DOWN TH' WAL-MART AN PICK YOU UP ANOTHER KC DAYLIGHTER, NOW, ELSE WE GO'N HAFTA KICK YOU OUT A THIS HERE RALLY RACE FER BEING UNPRESENTABLE-LIKE. GO'AN, NOW! GIT!

Don't you buy no ugly rally car!


PS - You can't enter either. Ugly!

***We now resume your regular lighting discussion...

---

Brian Driggs | KG7KCA | PHX, AZ | 89 Pajero
alterius non sit qui suus esse potest

Ugly, check.
Odd number of lights, check.
Contrary to every rule, theory, or automotive standard, check.

Something about those SAAB guys...

---

Jason McDaniel



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/27/2010 01:50PM by modernbeat.

Dang, here's the pic.

---

Jason McDaniel

Carl S Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I <3 Pods!
> $175 here
>
> $120 for their rings too, though theres gotta be a
> cheaper source for those somewhere. Anyone know?
> Then 4x Kchilites rally 800 Lenses @ $45 each =
> 180.
> Bulbs ~$7 each at www.rallylights.com
> $20 in wiring/relays.
> Just over $500 for 4 bright ass lights and a nice
> pod thats easy to mount and very simple to aim.
> $:light ratio is better than hid, unless you go
> with cheapie hid's of unknown quality.

I like this option. Has anyone here used this light pod? I'd like to know exactly how the lights are attached, so I can make sure I buy the right stuff. They don't sell the rings anymore, but those were only for PIAA lights anyway. Buying from the "replacement" section of KC Hi Lites looks like an awesome way to go, because I don't need the wiring, switches, and stock mounting stuff.

Doug

GE 250W Halogens. About $12 each. Hell on the alternator (you can hear it whine) and it requires a dedicated relay for each light, but they work.

These suckers will BURN YOU if you stand too close.

eyesoreracing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GE 250W Halogens. About $12 each. Hell on the
> alternator (you can hear it whine) and it requires
> a dedicated relay for each light, but they work.
>
> These suckers will BURN YOU if you stand too
> close.
>
Nice.
Along the same line Phillips 4049 are 150w 13v for about the same price, $12-14. They're 5.75" diameter, so you'd either need to buy housings (google grote par 46 housing ) or mount them some other way. I've got some to go on the volvo. Nothing wrong with some old school sealed beam action because the price sure is right.