Quote
heymagic
The 2.6 had timing chain issues and head gasket issues and most of them are just worn out junk by now. I'm digging on the Mitsu
forums!!!!! to get more info.
That‘s odd,considering that here are all the parts different between each version 2.0 and 2, whatever: (the G54B or 4G54 was 2555cc. First in pick ups and Firearrows they call it 2.6 and the same enine in Starions they call it 2.5, but its the same thing..91.1 x 98mm)
Crank--for different stroke
Piston diameter mentioned earlier, and rings of course.
Block to match the pistons
Everything else is the same: rods, rod small end size, rod bearings, main bearings, oil pump, chains, guides, skids, tensioner, covers sprockets, balance shafts and drive, rockers, springs, retainers etc , everything..
The interesting thing is that we have learned--well some of us who build engines that smaller bore sizes up to about 86mm, burn the charge better than large more motors---things about 86mm...
So while the hybrid worked great and ran like a clock for god know how many seasons (until tired valve springs let valve smack a piston)---and 92mm allowed room for bigger valves...........
The 2,0 with smaller bore could be fun--if there was some easy cheap way to up the compression.
Screw it get one of these up in BC:
4D55
2.3 კუბატურის დიზელი
Displacement - 2.3 L (2,346 cc)
Bore - 91.1 mm
Stroke - 90.0 mm
Fuel Type - Diesel
Valves per cylinder - 2
Looks like they went ahead and did what was my big plan...it does suggest itself and is so easy.
John Vanlandingham
Sleezattle, WA, USA
Vive le Prole-le-ralliat
www.rallyrace.net/jvab
CALL +1 206 431-9696
Remember! Pacific Standard Time
is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/23/2014 07:35PM by john vanlandingham.