Tim Taylor Tim Taylor Professional Moderator Location: Oakland, CA Join Date: 02/02/2007 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 622 Rally Car: Mazda 323 GTX |
some injur-nears have taken entire classes on metallurgy and welding...
FYI: T45 for cages is just an artifact of the British racing industry. It is a good cage material because it has similar yield strength to 4130 chromoly but also better ultimate strength so it will deform and absorb more energy before it breaks. It's also damn expensive because by virtue of being a niche alloy used mostly by british aerospace companies and cage builders. Most of continental Europe uses 25CrMo4 or 15CDV6 instead because it's much cheaper and does the same job. |
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Godlike Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
To all you Chrome moly experts and your truly bizarre claims that chrome moly is "brittle".....
Cars have bodies AND cages, both of which have some strength, together if done will is stronger than the the 2 thing separate... Motorcycles have only the frame.... Very light weight, very strong since the intended use of at least moto-cross bikes is like way way insaner in NORMAL use that wimpy little roll overs.... Knowing the normal stresses are quite severe, and that the expected life span is pretty high: Why the hell would 4130 or similar be the material of choice if it was "brittle"....?????? The one word that spring to mind when I think of chrome-moly steel is TOUGHNESS. I am feeling too shitty to argue this. back to bed. John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |
heymagic Banned Senior Moderator Location: La la land Join Date: 01/25/2006 Age: Fossilized Posts: 3,740 Rally Car: Not a Volvo |
If I remember correctly...
T45 is British and homolgated by the MSA . T45 is not approved by the FIA for home construction. So if an old cage FIA cage is sold and has homo papers it is allowed, no papers then it has to meet the FIA rules, not the MSA rules. So T45 is no good in this case. CDS can be used without papers depending on thickness and construction. A real homolgated car from say 1987 can be built with the older designs using CDS (not DOM or Cro-Mo or T45) of the prescribed dimensions. That could change as time progresses so I advise against it.Clear as mud eh?? Many of the "cute" homolgated designs are not very strong and fail due to being too lite. Someone swore under oath and testing they were ok. Prolly an engineer with a law degree and political aspirations. Saving 50 or 70 lbs in the average rally car is a total waste of time as most people never approach the driving limits that would actually make a difference at. New tires are a better investment. Better seats are a better investment. Make the cage hell for stout so when stoopid shit happens you have a chance to be around later and lie about whos fault it was... Building a cage to anything other than FIA or RA specs will get you a seat in the spectator area at RA events, just so ya know. No Halo Hoop, no Vbars, no skinny tubing. |
DaveK Dave Kern Senior Moderator Location: Centennial Join Date: 07/11/2008 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 1,085 Rally Car: Compact M3 & Evo IX |
How did you get papers from the cage manufacturer if the cage is past its homologation expiration date? Which manufacturer did you purchase the cage kit from? I was under the impression that once the homologation date is passed that they no longer can provide the homologation paperwork...so instead provide MSA certification (which I was told wasn't good enough for an RA/NASA logbook unless the cage met 253 specs on its own i.e. thick enough steel). Dave |
Doivi Clarkinen Banned Elite Moderator Location: the end of the universe Join Date: 02/12/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,432 Rally Car: 1980 Opel Ascona B |
Ok, I guess I have to clarify things a little bit. I'm talking about big crashes with big impacts that may or may not visibly deform the cage. Not a light roll in a ditch that just wrinkles the roof or laying your bike down in the mud. |
Doivi Clarkinen Banned Elite Moderator Location: the end of the universe Join Date: 02/12/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,432 Rally Car: 1980 Opel Ascona B |
And this is my whole point, how many builders CroMo cages in rally cars really properly heat treat (normalize) all the welds in the cage when they're done? Some welds are pretty hard to get to to do that and would probably result in warped sheet metal in a few locations, too. I'm not saying CroMo can't be done properly, look at off road racing trucks. Those are built tube frame CroMo and are beat on worse than rally cars but they are properly done and heat treated after welding. |
Doivi Clarkinen Banned Elite Moderator Location: the end of the universe Join Date: 02/12/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,432 Rally Car: 1980 Opel Ascona B |
Actually, toughness is a word I would attribute to DOM more. It can take a few hits and not be compromised. CroMo work hardens. Just the act of bending it makes it more brittle in that area. Can it be heat treated and normalized? Yeah, but how many people do that properly. And John, I just don't think you're understanding the terminology here or something. CroMo does have a higher tensile strength than DOM. That's why it is a good choice for things like motorcycle frames and suspension components. It's very stiff and doesn't "give" easily. You don't want a bike frame to bend very easily. However, the point CroMo does finally fail it will be more prone to fracturing or breaking as opposed to mild steel which will bend (at less force than the equally sized CroMo piece.) I have to put the caveat "equally sized" because in reality the CroMo tube is almost always going to be thinner since that's one of the reasons for using it. You can use thinner and lighter tubing with CroMo than with mild steel to get comparable strength. Actually, even so the CroMo is probably a bit stiffer but it will break at it's failure point, even when properly heat treated. My point is CroMo is a very good choice for certain components but for roll cages maybe not so much. You can't always control or really even check how properly the welds were done, and also a bit of "give", like DOM will provide, is actually a good thing in a rollcage. (And no, I'm not talking about collapsing, I mean energy absorbstion and dissipation.) |
A1337STI Alex Rademacher Mod Moderator Location: Reno,nv Join Date: 09/10/2007 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 686 Rally Car: 93 GC with an 01 RS swap! |
DOM Steel appears to make a much easier (cheaper and quicker) tech process than Cromo would require.
as interesting as the debate is .. how is it relevant to giving Lina advice on her build? she can't go Cromo and get it log booked , so end of discussion (in terms of helping her cage build) cutting holes in the floor/ taking the roof off, are both options she could go with and get booked. probably more worth while to debate options that still result in a log book.... Like door bars, (i'm not a cage builder or welder) but even looking at cars all log booked in the same year, i see some are much easier to get in and out of, and some are very hard to get in and out of. a local rally crosser is in mid process of installing the safedrives / auto power roll cage kit .. and his door bars are really damn high and his A piller support is a little far back. that = very very hard to get in and out... probably the worst i've seen. not sure if you can get failed to get a log book with a cage that meets the rules ,but is too hard to get in and out of, but if so , he might have that happen. |
alkun Albert Kun Professional Moderator Location: SF Ca. Join Date: 01/07/2008 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,732 Rally Car: volvo 242 |
|
Jon Burke Jon Burke Mod Moderator Location: San Francisco, CA Join Date: 01/03/2008 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,402 Rally Car: Subaru w/<1000 crashes |
|
phlat65 Sean Medcroft Senior Moderator Location: Edmonds, Washington Join Date: 02/12/2009 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,802 Rally Car: Building a Merkur |
|
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Godlike Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
|
Rallymech Robert Gobright Godlike Moderator Location: White Center Seattle Join Date: 04/27/2008 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,292 Rally Car: 91 VW GTI 8V |
|
Tim Taylor Tim Taylor Professional Moderator Location: Oakland, CA Join Date: 02/02/2007 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 622 Rally Car: Mazda 323 GTX |
|
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Godlike Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
You're right, but misinformation has spread as computer use has spread. Words mean whatever anybody wants them to mean 5.1 is HIGH gearing and 3.08 is low., CrMo---for decades was noted for its toughness, now its suddenly "brittle". Guys that have no clue what is being discussed now "know" what is meant even when those who have worked with these materials for 40 years day in and day out don't know--from the "explanation" what is meant. Everything is now "like whatever". John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |