Morison Banned Junior Moderator Location: Calgary, AB Join Date: 03/27/2009 Age: Ancient Posts: 1,798 Rally Car: (ex)86 RX-7(built), (ex)2.5RS (bought) |
Don't put words in my mouth. I started by asking the simple question of who appointed the committee in the first place. That's a question you dodged, when you could have admitted, in fewer words, that you appointed the members. I had absolutely no indication you had appointed the committee members until your comment a few posts later that 'your first two choices...' I don't really know you, I certainly don't know Dick Paddock, so how could I possibly make any suggestion about any one person's honesty or ability to be impartial. I wasn't. The process, however, does anything but instill confidence in the appeals process. Had you thrown the issue to the west coast NASA folks and have them appoint a committee to look at it the process would have been squeaky clean. Now, we all know the protest was bullshit at its core but does that mean reasonable process goes out the window? I really am curious how you can possibly think that you appointing the steward who's decision is being appealed to sit as the chair of the protest committee is 'OK.' First Rally: 2001 Driver (7), Co-Driver (44) Drivers (16) Clerk (10), Official (7), Volunteer (4) Cars Built (1), Engines Built (0) Cages Built (0) Last Updated, January 4, 2015
|
I don't think that that was what he was doing, even if it could have been worded better. He's also correct that having people involved in the original decision then be on the court of appeals is rather atypical. The SCCA, for example, does not allow it; in fact, members of the COA must recuse themselves if they competed at the event in question or know anyone involved. I don't see any reason to question the process here. I especially see no reason to question your integrity given the end result. But it does come across as weird and I would suggest that you all consider finding enough folks to staff a COA with no overlap with the event staff. edit: my post crossed with that above, but I'll leave it up, anyway; us trolls gotta stick together Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/24/2014 02:36PM by Iowa999. |
Mad Matt F Matt Follett Senior Moderator Location: La Belle Province, Montreal Join Date: 03/13/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 645 Rally Car: Don't Laugh, the Justy is Fun! |
Matt, I have enjoyed, er well, been compelled to continue reading this story... I think everyone one feels you are a decent dude, and just wanted to celebrate your victory. But this is rally. And reading everything is part of the game. You did miss a step. You guys were tired before you got started, you say you were late for a meeting? Well you missed an important part of the rally. It's really no different then below. This past year at Pines I got in town at 2:30am with the car, up at 5:30am to get tech'd, and didn't have time to change tires before our start. We went off, I blame tires, that's my fault. Part of Rally is reading the regs, all of them, and being on time. As is driving well, selecting the right tires, etc. |
Anders Green Anders Green Ultra Moderator Location: Raleigh, NC Join Date: 03/30/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,478 Rally Car: Parked |
I don't have to Morison, because you keep saying it. Here it is again, in the very post where you're responding: See there you are, discussing the process, saying you are not confident in it, which, given that your post already names the people involved, and you say you either don't know them well or don't know them at all, you're still willing to say you don't trust them to be impartial, without even knowing them. That's saying you think they (and by they I mean Anders Green and Dick Paddock) are untrustworthy. The best news, though, is you have free will. And you are free to avoid participating in any rally where you feel won't have an appeals process that inspires confidence, which naturally no racer should subjected to. And that is sweet, sweet nectar to me. If there's anything else I can do to lower your confidence in our appeals process, let me know. Anders ps: you wouldn't BELIEVE how many unmarked $100 bills I sent to everyone on the Court of Appeals! Grassroots rally. It's what I think about. |
|
Reamer Jeff Reamer Infallible Moderator Location: Marlette, Michigan Join Date: 08/14/2010 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 489 Rally Car: Subaru |
Yes this rally change my 10 min to 15 min. Guess I shouldnt of posted from memory. I wasnt going to post this hole thread then I just felt compelled to tell what I was thinking about. Now were adding the term regualar service to this.
brakim I just believe the route book should have said fuel only.. and both of the sup regs handed out should have as well And I agree. So all is well with the world. smiling smiley Anders ^ looks like at least 3 times? This with what Grant said about the crew should be responsable. Makes all well in the world! End troll rant! First rally 2013 Rally car type AWD subaru Total rallies as driver 6 Total rally cars built 2 Total rally cars caged 3 Total rally cars repaired from offs 4 Total years racing exp other then rally 19 yrs Like 31motorsports on FB! Check out 31motor sales on ebay for used Subaru parts |
Jard Jared Lantzy Mod Moderator Location: Silver Spring, MD Join Date: 09/15/2008 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 112 Rally Car: Free range navigator |
This was my question earlier today, more specifically WHAT IF they were different (meaning the supps and the route book both had a schedule and they were different). Well, if you RTFM, you learn:
So the road or route book is not a governing document, only the supps... Also to the note about crew: if they would have read the Rally Guide handed out at registration, it also identified Service B as "Fuel Only." Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/24/2014 03:25PM by Jard. |
Doivi Clarkinen Banned Senior Moderator Location: the end of the universe Join Date: 02/12/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 1,432 Rally Car: 1980 Opel Ascona B |
Why the fuck are we still talking about this? It's trivial. 6 pages in and we finally find out Brakim did receive the bulletin saying it was a fuel only stop. So none of the inquiries/protests/appeals should have really happened in the first place. Shit happens guys, sometimes you screw up. You just have to pay attention. Suck it up, learn and move on. We've all been there. You're not a special snowflake. I'm sure you'll be more diligent in the future.
|
The route book and sup regs and (still) online sup regs say SERVICE this is the only issue, NASA already said they know it was an error and have already begun to fix the issue is my understanding. We have already admitted our error in not noting that one of 4 documents we had said fuel service. this case has been closed for some time all parties actually involved have already come to this conclusion. I'm not sure why we keep repeating the same things over and over either...
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/24/2014 04:30PM by brakim. |
EricW Eric Wages Elite Moderator Location: Goose Creek, SC Join Date: 12/09/2008 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 280 Rally Car: 2002 WRX |
I contest at the groups mentioned are poor selections. Clearly the Canadians are the only ones that can be impartial about US grassroots rally! |
Cosworth Paulinho Ferreira Mod Moderator Location: Charlotte, NC Join Date: 03/15/2007 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 721 Rally Car: Honda Civic |
WHAT DA FUQ???
WHY is this now being turned into a NASA witch hunt??? All NASA did was break out a girly school fight. This thread has gotten too far and its only getting worse and since we don't have a moderator in this board to lock this thread, I will start posting some nasty porn pics and links to viral pages! War of attrition. |
mothra Matt Smith Infallible Moderator Location: Wilmington NC Join Date: 03/31/2006 Age: Possibly Wise Posts: 546 Rally Car: xr4ti |
Since various documents are being referred to in discussion I thought I would link to them.
http://sandblastrally.linaracing.com/2014/comp-main.php SB 2014 online Supplemental Regulations http://sandblastrally.linaracing.com/2014/forms/2014-SuppRegs.v4.pdf Matt Smith Racing in glorious black and red My daily life is a Saab story (sold!) Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/24/2014 06:44PM by mothra. |
|
turoc Ozgur Simsek Junior Moderator Location: Brooklyn, NY Join Date: 06/07/2006 Age: Midlife Crisis Posts: 561 Rally Car: working on a Veedub |
|
john vanlandingham John Vanlandingham Elite Moderator Location: Ford Asylum, Sleezattle, WA Join Date: 12/20/2005 Age: Fossilized Posts: 14,152 Rally Car: Saab 96 V4 |
By that impeccable logic the only people that can impartial for Canajian rally rules would be some comittee of people from the Unexplored Southern Area.. We did see what they managed to do with their fiasco regarding vehicle classes....that was a scandle of truly epic proportions John Vanlandingham Sleezattle, WA, USA Vive le Prole-le-ralliat www.rallyrace.net/jvab CALL +1 206 431-9696 Remember! Pacific Standard Time is 3 hours behind Eastern Standard Time. |